File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Presence, absence, and spatial relations: An Interactional Ethnography of physical-virtual field-based learning through a sociomaterial lens

TitlePresence, absence, and spatial relations: An Interactional Ethnography of physical-virtual field-based learning through a sociomaterial lens
Authors
KeywordsEcology
Field-based learning
Immersive technology
Interactional Ethnography
School-university partnership
Sociomateriality
Issue Date8-Jul-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2024, v. 47 How to Cite?
Abstract

Field-based learning has been central to ecology education in supporting scientific inquiry and connecting learners with nature. However, pandemic-era campus closures have renewed debates regarding the role of virtual and immersive experiences. This Interactional Ethnography (IE) of a university-secondary school initiative in Hong Kong employs a sociomaterial lens to trace field-based learning interactions within and across physical and virtual spaces. Metaphors from social topology guided analysis of an ethnographic archive of classroom and field-based video records, learning artifacts, and interviews. Our analysis surfaces how and in what ways organisms act as agents in providing an essential anchor and recurring motif within and across interactions, contexts and settings in the enacted field-based design. While their ‘absence’ in the classroom and virtual environment constructs a sense of authenticity through the flickering metaphor of fire space, the material and semiotic resources in the field enable fluidity, opening possibilities for multiple, often serendipitous forms of relations, presences and dialogues that support diverse forms of knowledge and learning. By positioning field-based learning as varying sociomaterial assemblages centering on natural materials, we reconsider physical-virtual binaries and propose their designs as entangled human and non-human spatial relations that recognize and elevate the agency of natural materials.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347621
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.821

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLo, Sergio CT-
dc.contributor.authorBridges, Susan M-
dc.contributor.authorChian, Monaliza M-
dc.contributor.authorYip, Valerie WY-
dc.contributor.authorLeung, Jessica SC-
dc.contributor.authorWong, Gary KW-
dc.contributor.authorNot, Christelle-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Gray A-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Kennedy KH-
dc.contributor.authorRussell, Bayden D-
dc.contributor.authorGoodwin, A Lin-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-25T06:05:46Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-25T06:05:46Z-
dc.date.issued2024-07-08-
dc.identifier.citationLearning, Culture and Social Interaction, 2024, v. 47-
dc.identifier.issn2210-6561-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/347621-
dc.description.abstract<p>Field-based learning has been central to ecology education in supporting scientific inquiry and connecting learners with nature. However, pandemic-era campus closures have renewed debates regarding the role of virtual and immersive experiences. This Interactional Ethnography (IE) of a university-secondary school initiative in Hong Kong employs a sociomaterial lens to trace field-based learning interactions within and across physical and virtual spaces. Metaphors from social topology guided analysis of an ethnographic archive of classroom and field-based video records, learning artifacts, and interviews. Our analysis surfaces how and in what ways organisms act as agents in providing an essential anchor and recurring motif within and across interactions, contexts and settings in the enacted field-based design. While their ‘absence’ in the classroom and virtual environment constructs a sense of authenticity through the flickering metaphor of fire space, the material and semiotic resources in the field enable fluidity, opening possibilities for multiple, often serendipitous forms of relations, presences and dialogues that support diverse forms of knowledge and learning. By positioning field-based learning as varying sociomaterial assemblages centering on natural materials, we reconsider physical-virtual binaries and propose their designs as entangled human and non-human spatial relations that recognize and elevate the agency of natural materials.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofLearning, Culture and Social Interaction-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectEcology-
dc.subjectField-based learning-
dc.subjectImmersive technology-
dc.subjectInteractional Ethnography-
dc.subjectSchool-university partnership-
dc.subjectSociomateriality-
dc.titlePresence, absence, and spatial relations: An Interactional Ethnography of physical-virtual field-based learning through a sociomaterial lens-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100834-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85197482055-
dc.identifier.volume47-
dc.identifier.eissn2210-657X-
dc.identifier.issnl2210-6561-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats