File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Artificial intelligence in classroom discourse: A systematic review of the past decade

TitleArtificial intelligence in classroom discourse: A systematic review of the past decade
Authors
KeywordsArtificial intelligence (AI)
Classroom discourse
Systematic review
Technology
Issue Date1-Jan-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
International Journal of Educational Research, 2024, v. 123 How to Cite?
Abstract

Over the past decade, multiple artificial intelligence-based models and systems have been developed and employed in classroom discourse as a means of facilitating learning and teaching. To provide valuable guidance for future studies seeking to effectively integrate powerful artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, this paper presents a systematic review of the literature on artificial intelligence in classroom discourse (AICD) over the past decade. Following the latest PRISMA framework, we searched the Web of Science database and the relevant conference proceedings and identified a total of 68 studies. Five themes across the studies were examined: basic sample statistics, educational contexts, data sources, AI technologies, and the effects of AICD. The findings revealed that most AICD studies focused on science-related and language-related at the primary and secondary school levels. Various AI models and systems were developed and used to analyze student-related interaction and learning (e.g., speech acts and collaboration), teacher-related instructional behavior (e.g., question-asking and uptake), and whole-class dialogue (e.g., topic evolution) based on their discourse data in both online and offline classroom settings. Furthermore, the use of AI in classroom discourse was found to be impactful on learning gains, emotions (e.g., willingness and affordance), behavior (e.g., teachers’ uptake and students’ conversation), and perception of AI. We further discussed the future directions of the field, such as the increasing popularity of deep learning models (e.g., ChatGPT) in investigations of classroom discourse and the urgent need to evaluate the effect of AICD in practice.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345893
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.060

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWang, Deliang-
dc.contributor.authorTao, Yang-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Gaowei-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-04T07:06:18Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-04T07:06:18Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-01-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Educational Research, 2024, v. 123-
dc.identifier.issn0883-0355-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345893-
dc.description.abstract<p>Over the past decade, multiple artificial intelligence-based models and systems have been developed and employed in classroom discourse as a means of facilitating learning and teaching. To provide valuable guidance for future studies seeking to effectively integrate powerful artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, this paper presents a systematic review of the literature on artificial intelligence in classroom discourse (AICD) over the past decade. Following the latest PRISMA framework, we searched the Web of Science database and the relevant conference proceedings and identified a total of 68 studies. Five themes across the studies were examined: basic sample statistics, educational contexts, data sources, AI technologies, and the effects of AICD. The findings revealed that most AICD studies focused on science-related and language-related at the primary and secondary school levels. Various AI models and systems were developed and used to analyze student-related interaction and learning (e.g., speech acts and collaboration), teacher-related instructional behavior (e.g., question-asking and uptake), and whole-class dialogue (e.g., topic evolution) based on their discourse data in both online and offline classroom settings. Furthermore, the use of AI in classroom discourse was found to be impactful on learning gains, emotions (e.g., willingness and affordance), behavior (e.g., teachers’ uptake and students’ conversation), and perception of AI. We further discussed the future directions of the field, such as the increasing popularity of deep learning models (e.g., ChatGPT) in investigations of classroom discourse and the urgent need to evaluate the effect of AICD in practice.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Educational Research-
dc.subjectArtificial intelligence (AI)-
dc.subjectClassroom discourse-
dc.subjectSystematic review-
dc.subjectTechnology-
dc.titleArtificial intelligence in classroom discourse: A systematic review of the past decade-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102275-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85177547715-
dc.identifier.volume123-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-538X-
dc.identifier.issnl0883-0355-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats