File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The dutch main concept analysis: Translation and establishment of normative data

TitleThe dutch main concept analysis: Translation and establishment of normative data
Authors
Issue Date2021
Citation
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2021, v. 30, n. 4, p. 1750-1766 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: The main concept analysis (MCA; Kong, 2009) quantifies the effectiveness and efficiency of information transfer during verbal discourse by means of four sets of sequential pictorial stimuli. This test was originally developed for a Cantonese-speaking population. The main goals of this study were (a) to translate and adapt the MCA to Dutch; (b) to establish normative data for healthy native Dutch-speaking adults; (c) to assess the effect of age, education level, and gender on MCA outcome; and (d) to establish inter-and intrarater reliability of the Dutch MCA. Method: Language samples were collected from 60 healthy native Dutch speakers, equally recruited in different age (20–39 years, 40–59 years, 60–79 years) and education (middle and highly educated) categories through administration of the MCA. Utterances produced by at least 75% of the participants were included as a main concept in the Dutch MCA. Subsequently, age-specific normative data were established for each of the MCA parameters. Finally, an ICC was calculated in order to verify inter-and intrarater reliability of the Dutch MCA. Results: The translated MCA consisted of 19 main concepts. Age-specific normative data were obtained. Both age and education level had a significant effect on MCA outcome. Information transfer in elderly was both less effectively and efficiently compared to young-and middle-aged adults. In addition, highly educated participants transferred information less efficiently compared to middle educated participants. Based on inter-and intrarater reliability measures, the Dutch MCA proved to be a reliable measuring instrument. Conclusions: The MCA was translated to Dutch, and age-specific normative data were established for a healthy, Dutch-speaking population. The Dutch MCA is a reliable tool for eliciting and quantifying discourse production. Validation of the test for people with aphasia is necessary in order for the test to be useful in a clinical practice.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307315
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.923
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCriel, Yana-
dc.contributor.authorDeleu, Marie-
dc.contributor.authorDe Groote, Evelien-
dc.contributor.authorBockstael, Annelies-
dc.contributor.authorKong, Anthony Pak Hin-
dc.contributor.authorDe Letter, Miet-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T06:22:21Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-03T06:22:21Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2021, v. 30, n. 4, p. 1750-1766-
dc.identifier.issn1058-0360-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307315-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The main concept analysis (MCA; Kong, 2009) quantifies the effectiveness and efficiency of information transfer during verbal discourse by means of four sets of sequential pictorial stimuli. This test was originally developed for a Cantonese-speaking population. The main goals of this study were (a) to translate and adapt the MCA to Dutch; (b) to establish normative data for healthy native Dutch-speaking adults; (c) to assess the effect of age, education level, and gender on MCA outcome; and (d) to establish inter-and intrarater reliability of the Dutch MCA. Method: Language samples were collected from 60 healthy native Dutch speakers, equally recruited in different age (20–39 years, 40–59 years, 60–79 years) and education (middle and highly educated) categories through administration of the MCA. Utterances produced by at least 75% of the participants were included as a main concept in the Dutch MCA. Subsequently, age-specific normative data were established for each of the MCA parameters. Finally, an ICC was calculated in order to verify inter-and intrarater reliability of the Dutch MCA. Results: The translated MCA consisted of 19 main concepts. Age-specific normative data were obtained. Both age and education level had a significant effect on MCA outcome. Information transfer in elderly was both less effectively and efficiently compared to young-and middle-aged adults. In addition, highly educated participants transferred information less efficiently compared to middle educated participants. Based on inter-and intrarater reliability measures, the Dutch MCA proved to be a reliable measuring instrument. Conclusions: The MCA was translated to Dutch, and age-specific normative data were established for a healthy, Dutch-speaking population. The Dutch MCA is a reliable tool for eliciting and quantifying discourse production. Validation of the test for people with aphasia is necessary in order for the test to be useful in a clinical practice.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Speech-Language Pathology-
dc.titleThe dutch main concept analysis: Translation and establishment of normative data-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1044/2021_AJSLP-20-00285-
dc.identifier.pmid34100632-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85111144652-
dc.identifier.volume30-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage1750-
dc.identifier.epage1766-
dc.identifier.eissn1558-9110-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000683585400014-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats