File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Communicating simply, but not too simply: Reporting of participants and speech and language interventions for aphasia after stroke

TitleCommunicating simply, but not too simply: Reporting of participants and speech and language interventions for aphasia after stroke
Authors
Keywordscomplex interventions
aphasia
stroke
speech and language therapy
Issue Date2020
Citation
International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2020, v. 22, n. 3, p. 302-312 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: Speech and language pathology (SLP) for aphasia is a complex intervention delivered to a heterogeneous population within diverse settings. Simplistic descriptions of participants and interventions in research hinder replication, interpretation of results, guideline and research developments through secondary data analyses. This study aimed to describe the availability of participant and intervention descriptors in existing aphasia research datasets. Method: We systematically identified aphasia research datasets containing ≥10 participants with information on time since stroke and language ability. We extracted participant and SLP intervention descriptions and considered the availability of data compared to historical and current reporting standards. We developed an extension to the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist to support meaningful classification and synthesis of the SLP interventions to support secondary data analysis. Result: Of 11, 314 identified records we screened 1131 full texts and received 75 dataset contributions. We extracted data from 99 additional public domain datasets. Participant age (97.1%) and sex (90.8%) were commonly available. Prior stroke (25.8%), living context (12.1%) and socio-economic status (2.3%) were rarely available. Therapy impairment target, frequency and duration were most commonly available but predominately described at group level. Home practice (46.3%) and tailoring (functional relevance 46.3%) were inconsistently available. Conclusion : Gaps in the availability of participant and intervention details were significant, hampering clinical implementation of evidence into practice and development of our field of research. Improvements in the quality and consistency of participant and intervention data reported in aphasia research are required to maximise clinical implementation, replication in research and the generation of insights from secondary data analysis. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018110947.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307301
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.4
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.526
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrady, Marian C.-
dc.contributor.authorAli, Myzoon-
dc.contributor.authorVandenBerg, Kathryn-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Linda J.-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Louise R.-
dc.contributor.authorAbo, Masahiro-
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Frank-
dc.contributor.authorBowen, Audrey-
dc.contributor.authorBrandenburg, Caitlin-
dc.contributor.authorBreitenstein, Caterina-
dc.contributor.authorBruehl, Stefanie-
dc.contributor.authorCopland, David A.-
dc.contributor.authorCranfill, Tamara B.-
dc.contributor.authordi Pietro-Bachmann, Marie-
dc.contributor.authorEnderby, Pamela-
dc.contributor.authorFillingham, Joanne-
dc.contributor.authorGalli, Federica Lucia-
dc.contributor.authorGandolfi, Marialuisa-
dc.contributor.authorGlize, Bertrand-
dc.contributor.authorGodecke, Erin-
dc.contributor.authorHawkins, Neil-
dc.contributor.authorHilari, Katerina-
dc.contributor.authorHinckley, Jacqueline-
dc.contributor.authorHorton, Simon-
dc.contributor.authorHoward, David-
dc.contributor.authorJaecks, Petra-
dc.contributor.authorJefferies, Elizabeth-
dc.contributor.authorJesus, Luis Mt-
dc.contributor.authorKambanaros, Maria-
dc.contributor.authorKang, Eun Kyoung-
dc.contributor.authorKhedr, Eman M.-
dc.contributor.authorKong, Anthony Pak-Hin-
dc.contributor.authorKukkonen, Tarja-
dc.contributor.authorLaganaro, Marina-
dc.contributor.authorLambon-Ralph, Matthew A.-
dc.contributor.authorLaska, Ann Charlotte-
dc.contributor.authorLeemann, Béatrice-
dc.contributor.authorLeff, Alexander P.-
dc.contributor.authorLima, Roxele R.-
dc.contributor.authorLorenz, Antje-
dc.contributor.authorMacWhinney, Brian-
dc.contributor.authorMarshall, Rebecca Shisler-
dc.contributor.authorMattioli, Flavia-
dc.contributor.authorMaviş, İlknur-
dc.contributor.authorMeinzer, Marcus-
dc.contributor.authorNilipour, Reza-
dc.contributor.authorNoé, Enrique-
dc.contributor.authorPaik, Nam Jong-
dc.contributor.authorPalmer, Rebecca-
dc.contributor.authorPapathanasiou, Ilias-
dc.contributor.authorPatricio, Brigida F.-
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Isabel Pavão-
dc.contributor.authorPrice, Cathy-
dc.contributor.authorJakovac, Tatjana Prizl-
dc.contributor.authorRochon, Elizabeth-
dc.contributor.authorRose, Miranda L.-
dc.contributor.authorRosso, Charlotte-
dc.contributor.authorRubi-Fessen, Ilona-
dc.contributor.authorRuiter, Marina B.-
dc.contributor.authorSnell, Claerwen-
dc.contributor.authorStahl, Benjamin-
dc.contributor.authorSzaflarski, Jerzy P.-
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Shirley A.-
dc.contributor.authorvan de Sandt-Koenderman, Mieke-
dc.contributor.authorvan der Meulen, Ineke-
dc.contributor.authorWorrall, Linda-
dc.contributor.authorWright, Heather Harris-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T06:22:20Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-03T06:22:20Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2020, v. 22, n. 3, p. 302-312-
dc.identifier.issn1754-9515-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307301-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: Speech and language pathology (SLP) for aphasia is a complex intervention delivered to a heterogeneous population within diverse settings. Simplistic descriptions of participants and interventions in research hinder replication, interpretation of results, guideline and research developments through secondary data analyses. This study aimed to describe the availability of participant and intervention descriptors in existing aphasia research datasets. Method: We systematically identified aphasia research datasets containing ≥10 participants with information on time since stroke and language ability. We extracted participant and SLP intervention descriptions and considered the availability of data compared to historical and current reporting standards. We developed an extension to the Template for Intervention Description and Replication checklist to support meaningful classification and synthesis of the SLP interventions to support secondary data analysis. Result: Of 11, 314 identified records we screened 1131 full texts and received 75 dataset contributions. We extracted data from 99 additional public domain datasets. Participant age (97.1%) and sex (90.8%) were commonly available. Prior stroke (25.8%), living context (12.1%) and socio-economic status (2.3%) were rarely available. Therapy impairment target, frequency and duration were most commonly available but predominately described at group level. Home practice (46.3%) and tailoring (functional relevance 46.3%) were inconsistently available. Conclusion : Gaps in the availability of participant and intervention details were significant, hampering clinical implementation of evidence into practice and development of our field of research. Improvements in the quality and consistency of participant and intervention data reported in aphasia research are required to maximise clinical implementation, replication in research and the generation of insights from secondary data analysis. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42018110947.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Speech-Language Pathology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectcomplex interventions-
dc.subjectaphasia-
dc.subjectstroke-
dc.subjectspeech and language therapy-
dc.titleCommunicating simply, but not too simply: Reporting of participants and speech and language interventions for aphasia after stroke-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/17549507.2020.1762000-
dc.identifier.pmid32686592-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85088257033-
dc.identifier.volume22-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.spage302-
dc.identifier.epage312-
dc.identifier.eissn1754-9507-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000550159300005-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats