File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Parental heuristics and demand for private tutoring: continuities amidst changes brought by China’s double-reduction policy

TitleParental heuristics and demand for private tutoring: continuities amidst changes brought by China’s double-reduction policy
Authors
Issue Date20-Nov-2025
PublisherElsevier
Citation
International Journal of Educational Development, 2025, v. 119 How to Cite?
Abstract

During the initial decades of the present century, China was among countries known for their high enrolment rates in private tutoring alongside schooling. In 2021, government policy brought the tutorial sector to an abrupt and dramatic contraction. The policy was known as ‘double reduction’ since it targeted both out-of-school tutoring and school-administered homework. Among factors underlying the policy were the study burdens on young people and social inequalities arising from the fact that prosperous households could afford tutoring more easily than lower-income counterparts. Although some parents welcomed the policy, others persisted with demand for tutoring through hidden channels at higher prices. Developments thus demonstrated considerable continuity despite broader change. This article examines patterns based on mixed-methods research, paying particular attention to the heuristics through which parents made decisions about continuing demand for tutoring amidst changing equilibria. Showing the limits even of fierce government efforts, the paper has implications not only for China but also for other countries in which authorities desire to reduce the scale and ameliorate the implications of private tutoring.During the initial decades of the present century, China was among countries known for their high enrolment rates in private tutoring alongside schooling. In 2021, government policy brought the tutorial sector to an abrupt and dramatic contraction. The policy was known as ‘double reduction’ since it targeted both out-of-school tutoring and school-administered homework. Among factors underlying the policy were the study burdens on young people and social inequalities arising from the fact that prosperous households could afford tutoring more easily than lower-income counterparts. Although some parents welcomed the policy, others persisted with demand for tutoring through hidden channels at higher prices. Developments thus demonstrated considerable continuity despite broader change. This article examines patterns based on mixed-methods research, paying particular attention to the heuristics through which parents made decisions about continuing demand for tutoring amidst changing equilibria. Showing the limits even of fierce government efforts, the paper has implications not only for China but also for other countries in which authorities desire to reduce the scale and ameliorate the implications of private tutoring.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366795
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.899

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Junyan-
dc.contributor.authorBray, Mark-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-25T04:21:57Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-25T04:21:57Z-
dc.date.issued2025-11-20-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Educational Development, 2025, v. 119-
dc.identifier.issn0738-0593-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366795-
dc.description.abstract<p>During the initial decades of the present century, China was among countries known for their high enrolment rates in private tutoring alongside schooling. In 2021, government policy brought the tutorial sector to an abrupt and dramatic contraction. The policy was known as ‘double reduction’ since it targeted both out-of-school tutoring and school-administered homework. Among factors underlying the policy were the study burdens on young people and social inequalities arising from the fact that prosperous households could afford tutoring more easily than lower-income counterparts. Although some parents welcomed the policy, others persisted with demand for tutoring through hidden channels at higher prices. Developments thus demonstrated considerable continuity despite broader change. This article examines patterns based on mixed-methods research, paying particular attention to the heuristics through which parents made decisions about continuing demand for tutoring amidst changing equilibria. Showing the limits even of fierce government efforts, the paper has implications not only for China but also for other countries in which authorities desire to reduce the scale and ameliorate the implications of private tutoring.During the initial decades of the present century, China was among countries known for their high enrolment rates in private tutoring alongside schooling. In 2021, government policy brought the tutorial sector to an abrupt and dramatic contraction. The policy was known as ‘double reduction’ since it targeted both out-of-school tutoring and school-administered homework. Among factors underlying the policy were the study burdens on young people and social inequalities arising from the fact that prosperous households could afford tutoring more easily than lower-income counterparts. Although some parents welcomed the policy, others persisted with demand for tutoring through hidden channels at higher prices. Developments thus demonstrated considerable continuity despite broader change. This article examines patterns based on mixed-methods research, paying particular attention to the heuristics through which parents made decisions about continuing demand for tutoring amidst changing equilibria. Showing the limits even of fierce government efforts, the paper has implications not only for China but also for other countries in which authorities desire to reduce the scale and ameliorate the implications of private tutoring.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Educational Development-
dc.titleParental heuristics and demand for private tutoring: continuities amidst changes brought by China’s double-reduction policy-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.ijedudev.2025.103451-
dc.identifier.volume119-
dc.identifier.eissn1873-4871-
dc.identifier.issnl0738-0593-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats