File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A Behavioral and fNIRS Comparative Study of Gender and Task Differences in Mental Rotation Among Primary Students

TitleA Behavioral and fNIRS Comparative Study of Gender and Task Differences in Mental Rotation Among Primary Students
Authors
Keywordsbehavioral measures
fNIRS
gender effect
mental rotation
task effect
Type II error
Issue Date23-Mar-2025
PublisherWiley Open Access
Citation
Brain and Behavior, 2025, v. 15, n. 3 How to Cite?
AbstractPurpose: This study investigated the sex and task effects in mental rotation (MR) among Chinese primary school students, employing behavioral assessments and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for a comprehensive analysis. Method: The sample consisted of 62 Grade 4 and 5 students aged between 9.58 and 11.33 (Mage = 10.604, SD = 0.35). Participants completed two MR tasks: MR1, which required the rotation of 24 figures, and MR2, which involved the rotation of 16 English letters. fNIRS was employed to measure neural activation in specific brain areas, and behavioral performance was assessed alongside brain activity. Findings: Behavioral data revealed no significant effects of sex or task type on the performance of MR1 or MR2. However, the fNIRS results demonstrated notable sex and task effects. Specifically, boys exhibited significantly higher brain activation in Brodmann Areas (BAs) 6, 9, and 46 than girls. In contrast, girls showed significantly more activation in BA 46 during the MR1 figure rotation task. This suggests that while behavioral tasks showed no differences, neuroimaging revealed underlying neural disparities. Conclusion: The discrepancy between behavioral and fNIRS findings reveals a tendency in behavioral studies to accept a false negative, resulting in Type II errors. While neuroimaging data indicate substantial differences not reflected in behavioral measures, this challenges the reliability of null results typically associated with traditional behavioral paradigms. This study highlights the critical need to integrate neuroimaging techniques to understand cognitive processes better. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of reevaluating conventional interpretations of behavioral data to ensure a more comprehensive view of mental function.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366254
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.908

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWu, Dandan-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Jinfeng-
dc.contributor.authorWan, Zhi Hong-
dc.contributor.authorShen, Yining-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Qianming-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Jinghui-
dc.contributor.authorCao, Simin-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Hui-
dc.date.accessioned2025-11-25T04:18:23Z-
dc.date.available2025-11-25T04:18:23Z-
dc.date.issued2025-03-23-
dc.identifier.citationBrain and Behavior, 2025, v. 15, n. 3-
dc.identifier.issn2162-3279-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/366254-
dc.description.abstractPurpose: This study investigated the sex and task effects in mental rotation (MR) among Chinese primary school students, employing behavioral assessments and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) for a comprehensive analysis. Method: The sample consisted of 62 Grade 4 and 5 students aged between 9.58 and 11.33 (Mage = 10.604, SD = 0.35). Participants completed two MR tasks: MR1, which required the rotation of 24 figures, and MR2, which involved the rotation of 16 English letters. fNIRS was employed to measure neural activation in specific brain areas, and behavioral performance was assessed alongside brain activity. Findings: Behavioral data revealed no significant effects of sex or task type on the performance of MR1 or MR2. However, the fNIRS results demonstrated notable sex and task effects. Specifically, boys exhibited significantly higher brain activation in Brodmann Areas (BAs) 6, 9, and 46 than girls. In contrast, girls showed significantly more activation in BA 46 during the MR1 figure rotation task. This suggests that while behavioral tasks showed no differences, neuroimaging revealed underlying neural disparities. Conclusion: The discrepancy between behavioral and fNIRS findings reveals a tendency in behavioral studies to accept a false negative, resulting in Type II errors. While neuroimaging data indicate substantial differences not reflected in behavioral measures, this challenges the reliability of null results typically associated with traditional behavioral paradigms. This study highlights the critical need to integrate neuroimaging techniques to understand cognitive processes better. Furthermore, it emphasizes the importance of reevaluating conventional interpretations of behavioral data to ensure a more comprehensive view of mental function.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley Open Access-
dc.relation.ispartofBrain and Behavior-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectbehavioral measures-
dc.subjectfNIRS-
dc.subjectgender effect-
dc.subjectmental rotation-
dc.subjecttask effect-
dc.subjectType II error-
dc.titleA Behavioral and fNIRS Comparative Study of Gender and Task Differences in Mental Rotation Among Primary Students-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/brb3.70358-
dc.identifier.pmid40123158-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-105000697912-
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.issue3-
dc.identifier.eissn2157-9032-
dc.identifier.issnl2162-3279-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats