File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A Simple Model to Describe Different Types of Exchange Bias Training Effect

TitleA Simple Model to Describe Different Types of Exchange Bias Training Effect
Authors
KeywordsExchange bias
Interfacial exchange coupling
Pinning magnetization
Training effect
Issue Date2016
Citation
Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism, 2016, v. 29, n. 2, p. 531-536 How to Cite?
AbstractThe exchange bias (EB) training effect, referring to the exchange field (HE) and/or the coercivity (HC) decreasing with the magnetic cycle (n), is often accompanied with EB. Usually, the EB training effect has different types, showing that HC1 (coercive field at the descending branch) and HC2 (coercive field at the ascending branch) change with n differently. In order to understand the origin producing the training type, a phenomenological model is therefore proposed. According to this model, how HC1 (or HC2) changes with n is determined by the change of pinning magnetization at the descending (or ascending) branch during the training process. For verifying the validity of our model, various experimental training results with respect to different exchange-biased systems are selected for fitting and all the fitting results are nearly perfect.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/363940
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.355

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yangqun-
dc.contributor.authorRui, Wenbin-
dc.contributor.authorShi, Zhong-
dc.contributor.authorZhou, Shiming-
dc.contributor.authorYang, Mao-
dc.contributor.authorYou, Biao-
dc.contributor.authorDu, Jun-
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-17T07:20:12Z-
dc.date.available2025-10-17T07:20:12Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism, 2016, v. 29, n. 2, p. 531-536-
dc.identifier.issn1557-1939-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/363940-
dc.description.abstractThe exchange bias (EB) training effect, referring to the exchange field (H<inf>E</inf>) and/or the coercivity (H<inf>C</inf>) decreasing with the magnetic cycle (n), is often accompanied with EB. Usually, the EB training effect has different types, showing that H<inf>C1</inf> (coercive field at the descending branch) and H<inf>C2</inf> (coercive field at the ascending branch) change with n differently. In order to understand the origin producing the training type, a phenomenological model is therefore proposed. According to this model, how H<inf>C1</inf> (or H<inf>C2</inf>) changes with n is determined by the change of pinning magnetization at the descending (or ascending) branch during the training process. For verifying the validity of our model, various experimental training results with respect to different exchange-biased systems are selected for fitting and all the fitting results are nearly perfect.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism-
dc.subjectExchange bias-
dc.subjectInterfacial exchange coupling-
dc.subjectPinning magnetization-
dc.subjectTraining effect-
dc.titleA Simple Model to Describe Different Types of Exchange Bias Training Effect-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10948-015-3333-x-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84954286853-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage531-
dc.identifier.epage536-
dc.identifier.eissn1557-1947-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats