File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113306
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-105009223232
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Circular economy application in construction: An evaluation of modular integrated construction (MiC) lifecycle assessments
| Title | Circular economy application in construction: An evaluation of modular integrated construction (MiC) lifecycle assessments |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Carbon emissions Circular construction Circular economy indicator High-rise buildings Modular integrated construction (MiC) |
| Issue Date | 1-Oct-2025 |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Citation | Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, v. 111 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Modular integrated construction (MiC) technology has emerged as the building sector advances towards lean construction. Previous research has pointed out that replacing some cast-in-situ processes with prefabricated components may significantly reduce the carbon footprint of buildings. This study focuses on the environmental impact of high-rise prefabricated concrete residential buildings and compares the Global Warming Potential (GWP) in buildings through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methods in linear and circular construction contexts. The findings indicate that concrete MiC has an advantage in GWP reduction at around 6 %. Yet, the LCA under the circular process results reveal that substantial benefits of concrete MiC, with 20 %–26 % lower annual carbon emissions when the assumed first and second lifespans range from 25 to 50 years. This research also applies the Circular Economy (CE) indicator to find the optimal material circular scenario, indicating that a dual-lifecycle totalling 50 to 60 years can be more efficient. This research underscores the potential of MiC in contributing to sustainable construction through the lens of circular LCA, which emphasises material reclaim. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/363923 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 6.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.397 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Liu, Ying | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Loo, Becky P.Y. | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-10-17T00:35:23Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-10-17T00:35:23Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-10-01 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Building Engineering, 2025, v. 111 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2352-7102 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/363923 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Modular integrated construction (MiC) technology has emerged as the building sector advances towards lean construction. Previous research has pointed out that replacing some cast-in-situ processes with prefabricated components may significantly reduce the carbon footprint of buildings. This study focuses on the environmental impact of high-rise prefabricated concrete residential buildings and compares the Global Warming Potential (GWP) in buildings through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methods in linear and circular construction contexts. The findings indicate that concrete MiC has an advantage in GWP reduction at around 6 %. Yet, the LCA under the circular process results reveal that substantial benefits of concrete MiC, with 20 %–26 % lower annual carbon emissions when the assumed first and second lifespans range from 25 to 50 years. This research also applies the Circular Economy (CE) indicator to find the optimal material circular scenario, indicating that a dual-lifecycle totalling 50 to 60 years can be more efficient. This research underscores the potential of MiC in contributing to sustainable construction through the lens of circular LCA, which emphasises material reclaim. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Elsevier | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Building Engineering | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | Carbon emissions | - |
| dc.subject | Circular construction | - |
| dc.subject | Circular economy indicator | - |
| dc.subject | High-rise buildings | - |
| dc.subject | Modular integrated construction (MiC) | - |
| dc.title | Circular economy application in construction: An evaluation of modular integrated construction (MiC) lifecycle assessments | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jobe.2025.113306 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-105009223232 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 111 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 2352-7102 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 2352-7102 | - |
