File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00472
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-105004946452
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: The Effect of Dialect and Accent on Digit Perception in Noise in Young Listeners With Normal Hearing
| Title | The Effect of Dialect and Accent on Digit Perception in Noise in Young Listeners With Normal Hearing |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Issue Date | 8-May-2025 |
| Publisher | American Speech-Language-Hearing Association |
| Citation | Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2025, v. 68, n. 5, p. 2584-2596 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Purpose:Dialect and accent factors can impact speech-in-noise testing outcomes. This study investigated these effects on the Integrated Digit-in-Noise (iDIN) test among young adults with normal hearing. Method:Dialects involve variations in grammar, vocabulary, and syntax, while accents influence only pronunciation, reflecting geographical or social origins. In Study 1, which examined dialect effects, 33 participants—all native speakers of Mandarin and various Wu dialects except Ningboese—underwent iDIN testing in both Ningboese and Mandarin (as a reference condition). In Study 2, which focused on accent effects, 39 participants—all native speakers of Mandarin and Ningboese, including 19 standard Ningboese and 20 accented Ningboese speakers —underwent iDIN testing in both Mandarin and standard Ningboese at fixed signal-to-noise ratio and adaptive measurements. Results:In Study 1, the results revealed statistically significant differences between the Mandarin and Ningboese iDIN results across all conditions except for the 2-digit sequences. In Study 2, the results showed no significant differences in 3-digit SRTs between standard and accented Ningboese speakers, but a significant difference in 5-digit SRTs. Conclusions:In Mainland China or other regions with high linguistic diversity, accounting for dialect and accent exposure is crucial in evaluating speech recognition, and a 2-digit DIN may be more suitable for valid hearing screening. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/362156 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.2 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.827 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Wang, Shangqiguo | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Wong, Lena L N | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Shen, Xiaoli | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-19T00:33:15Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-19T00:33:15Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025-05-08 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 2025, v. 68, n. 5, p. 2584-2596 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1092-4388 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/362156 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | <h3>Purpose:</h3><p>Dialect and accent factors can impact speech-in-noise testing outcomes. This study investigated these effects on the Integrated Digit-in-Noise (iDIN) test among young adults with normal hearing.</p><h3>Method:</h3><p>Dialects involve variations in grammar, vocabulary, and syntax, while accents influence only pronunciation, reflecting geographical or social origins. In Study 1, which examined dialect effects, 33 participants—all native speakers of Mandarin and various Wu dialects except Ningboese—underwent iDIN testing in both Ningboese and Mandarin (as a reference condition). In Study 2, which focused on accent effects, 39 participants—all native speakers of Mandarin and Ningboese, including 19 standard Ningboese and 20 accented Ningboese speakers —underwent iDIN testing in both Mandarin and standard Ningboese at fixed signal-to-noise ratio and adaptive measurements.</p><h3>Results:</h3><p>In Study 1, the results revealed statistically significant differences between the Mandarin and Ningboese iDIN results across all conditions except for the 2-digit sequences. In Study 2, the results showed no significant differences in 3-digit SRTs between standard and accented Ningboese speakers, but a significant difference in 5-digit SRTs.</p><h3>Conclusions:</h3><p>In Mainland China or other regions with high linguistic diversity, accounting for dialect and accent exposure is crucial in evaluating speech recognition, and a 2-digit DIN may be more suitable for valid hearing screening.</p> | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | American Speech-Language-Hearing Association | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.title | The Effect of Dialect and Accent on Digit Perception in Noise in Young Listeners With Normal Hearing | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1044/2025_JSLHR-24-00472 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-105004946452 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 68 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 5 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 2584 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 2596 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1558-9102 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 1092-4388 | - |
