File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.07.001
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-84978879990
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A curious case of superscript (−1): Prospective secondary mathematics teachers explain
| Title | A curious case of superscript (−1): Prospective secondary mathematics teachers explain |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Homonymy Inverse function Polysemy Reciprocal Script writing |
| Issue Date | 2016 |
| Citation | Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 2016, v. 43, p. 98-110 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | In mathematics the same symbol – superscript (−1) – is used to indicate an inverse of a function and a reciprocal of a rational number. Is there a reason for using the same symbol in both cases? We analyze the responses of prospective secondary school teachers to this question. The responses are presented in a form of a dialogue between a teacher and a student and are accompanied with participants’ commentary on their choices of instructional approaches. The data show that the majority of participants treat the symbol ☐−1 as a homonym, that is, the symbol is assigned different and unrelated meanings depending on a context. We discuss how knowledge of advanced mathematics (or lack of it) can guide instructional interaction. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361348 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 1.0 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.787 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Zazkis, Rina | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Kontorovich, Igor’ | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-16T04:16:18Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-16T04:16:18Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2016 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 2016, v. 43, p. 98-110 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0732-3123 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/361348 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | In mathematics the same symbol – superscript (−1) – is used to indicate an inverse of a function and a reciprocal of a rational number. Is there a reason for using the same symbol in both cases? We analyze the responses of prospective secondary school teachers to this question. The responses are presented in a form of a dialogue between a teacher and a student and are accompanied with participants’ commentary on their choices of instructional approaches. The data show that the majority of participants treat the symbol ☐<sup>−1</sup> as a homonym, that is, the symbol is assigned different and unrelated meanings depending on a context. We discuss how knowledge of advanced mathematics (or lack of it) can guide instructional interaction. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Mathematical Behavior | - |
| dc.subject | Homonymy | - |
| dc.subject | Inverse function | - |
| dc.subject | Polysemy | - |
| dc.subject | Reciprocal | - |
| dc.subject | Script writing | - |
| dc.title | A curious case of superscript (−1): Prospective secondary mathematics teachers explain | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.07.001 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-84978879990 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 43 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 98 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 110 | - |
