File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1007/s12144-024-06452-0
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85202923732
- Find via

Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Family system profiles and career decision self-efficacy among Chinese university students: a latent profile analysis
| Title | Family system profiles and career decision self-efficacy among Chinese university students: a latent profile analysis |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Career decision self-efficacy Chinese university students Family process Family structure Latent profile analysis |
| Issue Date | 22-Sep-2024 |
| Publisher | Springer |
| Citation | Current Psychology, 2024, v. 43, n. 7, p. 29793-29804 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | Family system generally consists of family structure and process, and plays substantial yet varied roles in university students’ career decision self-efficacy (CDSE). However, previous research has mainly employed the variable-centered approach, which overlooked the diversities of family systems in light of individuals’ CDSE. Adopting latent profile analysis, the present study examined the relationships between various family structural (socioeconomic status) and processual factors (parental career-related support) with CDSE among 917 Chinese undergraduates (Mage = 21.41, SD = 0.84; females, 53.87%). Five distinct family profiles were identified: “powerful and supportive” (N = 377, 41.12%), “powerful but unsupportive” (N = 61, 6.65%), “powerless but supportive” (N = 104, 11.34%), “powerless and unsupportive” (N = 62, 6.76%), and “ordinary powerful and supportive” (N = 313, 34.13%). The scores of CDSE significantly differed among the different family system profiles. The order from the lowest to highest CDSE was “powerless and unsupportive” (M = 3.48, SD = 0.08), “powerful but unsupportive” (M = 3.53, SD = 0.07), “powerless but supportive” (M = 3.74, SD = 0.05), “ordinary powerful and supportive” (M = 3.77, SD = 0.03), to “powerful and supportive” (M = 3.86, SD = 0.03). Additional regression analyses, after controlling for demographic variables, further confirmed the findings from multivariate analysis of variance and follow-up post hoc tests regarding the differences of CDSE among different profiles. The findings underscored family system patterns in shaping CDSE, and provided implications for improving career development among Chinese college students. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/359445 |
| ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.5 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.001 |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Gao, Xin | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Li, Mengting | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Fan, Weiqiao | - |
| dc.contributor.author | Zhang, Li Fang | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-05T00:30:08Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-05T00:30:08Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024-09-22 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Current Psychology, 2024, v. 43, n. 7, p. 29793-29804 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1046-1310 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/359445 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Family system generally consists of family structure and process, and plays substantial yet varied roles in university students’ career decision self-efficacy (CDSE). However, previous research has mainly employed the variable-centered approach, which overlooked the diversities of family systems in light of individuals’ CDSE. Adopting latent profile analysis, the present study examined the relationships between various family structural (socioeconomic status) and processual factors (parental career-related support) with CDSE among 917 Chinese undergraduates (Mage = 21.41, SD = 0.84; females, 53.87%). Five distinct family profiles were identified: “powerful and supportive” (N = 377, 41.12%), “powerful but unsupportive” (N = 61, 6.65%), “powerless but supportive” (N = 104, 11.34%), “powerless and unsupportive” (N = 62, 6.76%), and “ordinary powerful and supportive” (N = 313, 34.13%). The scores of CDSE significantly differed among the different family system profiles. The order from the lowest to highest CDSE was “powerless and unsupportive” (M = 3.48, SD = 0.08), “powerful but unsupportive” (M = 3.53, SD = 0.07), “powerless but supportive” (M = 3.74, SD = 0.05), “ordinary powerful and supportive” (M = 3.77, SD = 0.03), to “powerful and supportive” (M = 3.86, SD = 0.03). Additional regression analyses, after controlling for demographic variables, further confirmed the findings from multivariate analysis of variance and follow-up post hoc tests regarding the differences of CDSE among different profiles. The findings underscored family system patterns in shaping CDSE, and provided implications for improving career development among Chinese college students. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Springer | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Current Psychology | - |
| dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
| dc.subject | Career decision self-efficacy | - |
| dc.subject | Chinese university students | - |
| dc.subject | Family process | - |
| dc.subject | Family structure | - |
| dc.subject | Latent profile analysis | - |
| dc.title | Family system profiles and career decision self-efficacy among Chinese university students: a latent profile analysis | - |
| dc.type | Article | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s12144-024-06452-0 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85202923732 | - |
| dc.identifier.volume | 43 | - |
| dc.identifier.issue | 7 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 29793 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 29804 | - |
| dc.identifier.eissn | 1936-4733 | - |
| dc.identifier.issnl | 1046-1310 | - |
