File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Exploring Students’ Online Social Annotation Types: A Content Analysis and Corpus-based Approach

TitleExploring Students’ Online Social Annotation Types: A Content Analysis and Corpus-based Approach
Authors
Issue Date23-Mar-2025
Abstract

Online social annotation tools have gained widespread adoption in education, offering numerous
benefits for collaborative learning and knowledge construction. These tools foster a community of
inquiry, enabling students to actively engage in reading, share insights, and participate in
discussions. Existing research primarily focuses on the pedagogical application of online social
annotation, teacher’s and students’ perceptions, the effects on students’ learning. Yet, students’
annotation types within the broader context of a learning community are under-explored.
This study addresses this research gap by analysing students’ annotation types and linguistic features
in the context of online social annotation. The research questions for this study include: 1) What are
the prevalent types of annotations made by students on Perusall? 2) What are the characteristics
sentence patterns associated with each type of annotation? The data were collected from 60
taught-postgraduate students enrolled in a TESOL program, utilizing the Perusall platform in one of
their core courses. A total of 6517 annotations from 21 readings were examined using content
analysis to identify the annotation types. Subsequently, a corpus-based analysis was performed to
explore the sentence patterns of each annotation type, building upon the results of the content
analysis.
The findings reveal ten distinct annotation types, including discussion initiation, direct response,
confirmative feedback, appreciation, challenge/critique, note-taking, reflection, knowledge
application, schema bridging, and resource sharing. The representative sentence patterns for each
annotation type are identified by performing N-gram analysis. Understanding these annotation types
and their linguistic features provides valuable insights into students’ styles of online social
annotation. This knowledge equips teachers with a deeper understanding of their students’
engagement and enables the provision of targeted scaffolding and pedagogical interventions. The
development of this coding scheme serves as a theoretical contribution advancing our understanding
of collaborative learning, knowledge construction, and community engagement within online
learning environments.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/358848

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXin, Jieting Jerry-
dc.contributor.authorTavares, Nicole Judith-
dc.date.accessioned2025-08-13T07:48:24Z-
dc.date.available2025-08-13T07:48:24Z-
dc.date.issued2025-03-23-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/358848-
dc.description.abstract<p>Online social annotation tools have gained widespread adoption in education, offering numerous<br>benefits for collaborative learning and knowledge construction. These tools foster a community of<br>inquiry, enabling students to actively engage in reading, share insights, and participate in<br>discussions. Existing research primarily focuses on the pedagogical application of online social<br>annotation, teacher’s and students’ perceptions, the effects on students’ learning. Yet, students’<br>annotation types within the broader context of a learning community are under-explored.<br>This study addresses this research gap by analysing students’ annotation types and linguistic features<br>in the context of online social annotation. The research questions for this study include: 1) What are<br>the prevalent types of annotations made by students on Perusall? 2) What are the characteristics<br>sentence patterns associated with each type of annotation? The data were collected from 60<br>taught-postgraduate students enrolled in a TESOL program, utilizing the Perusall platform in one of<br>their core courses. A total of 6517 annotations from 21 readings were examined using content<br>analysis to identify the annotation types. Subsequently, a corpus-based analysis was performed to<br>explore the sentence patterns of each annotation type, building upon the results of the content<br>analysis.<br>The findings reveal ten distinct annotation types, including discussion initiation, direct response,<br>confirmative feedback, appreciation, challenge/critique, note-taking, reflection, knowledge<br>application, schema bridging, and resource sharing. The representative sentence patterns for each<br>annotation type are identified by performing N-gram analysis. Understanding these annotation types<br>and their linguistic features provides valuable insights into students’ styles of online social<br>annotation. This knowledge equips teachers with a deeper understanding of their students’<br>engagement and enables the provision of targeted scaffolding and pedagogical interventions. The<br>development of this coding scheme serves as a theoretical contribution advancing our understanding<br>of collaborative learning, knowledge construction, and community engagement within online<br>learning environments.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Association for Applied Linguistics Conference 2025 (22/03/2025-25/03/2025, Denver, Colorado )-
dc.titleExploring Students’ Online Social Annotation Types: A Content Analysis and Corpus-based Approach-
dc.typeConference_Paper-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats