File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: A mixed-methods study of strategy use in academic vocabulary learning among first-year undergraduates in Hong Kong

TitleA mixed-methods study of strategy use in academic vocabulary learning among first-year undergraduates in Hong Kong
Authors
KeywordsAcademic disciplines
Academic vocabulary
Higher education
Proficiency
Vocabulary learning strategies
Issue Date27-Jan-2025
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 2025, v. 74 How to Cite?
AbstractAlthough academic vocabulary is crucial for success in higher education, English for Academic Purposes (EAP) courses often neglect the teaching of such vocabulary, leaving students to learn it independently. It is thus important to examine how students employ vocabulary learning strategies (VLSs) to meet their academic challenges. In this mixed-methods study, we examine the VLSs of first-year undergraduates (n = 172) with varying proficiency levels studying different academic disciplines using a questionnaire and follow-up interviews. The findings show that students used a range of VLSs to different extents. Dictionary and guessing strategies were preferred by most students, while goal setting was less common, particularly among more proficient students. We also found that highly proficient students exhibited greater confidence when learning academic vocabulary incidentally. When using a dictionary, they focused on multiple aspects of word knowledge beyond definitions. However, social strategies, such as seeking help from teachers and peers, were underutilised, especially among science students. The study emphasises the need for pedagogical interventions that address students’ academic vocabulary needs, particularly through explicit instruction.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354932
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.589

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChung, Edsoulla-
dc.contributor.authorFung, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorWan, Aaron-
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-18T00:35:26Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-18T00:35:26Z-
dc.date.issued2025-01-27-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of English for Academic Purposes, 2025, v. 74-
dc.identifier.issn1475-1585-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354932-
dc.description.abstractAlthough academic vocabulary is crucial for success in higher education, English for Academic Purposes (EAP) courses often neglect the teaching of such vocabulary, leaving students to learn it independently. It is thus important to examine how students employ vocabulary learning strategies (VLSs) to meet their academic challenges. In this mixed-methods study, we examine the VLSs of first-year undergraduates (n = 172) with varying proficiency levels studying different academic disciplines using a questionnaire and follow-up interviews. The findings show that students used a range of VLSs to different extents. Dictionary and guessing strategies were preferred by most students, while goal setting was less common, particularly among more proficient students. We also found that highly proficient students exhibited greater confidence when learning academic vocabulary incidentally. When using a dictionary, they focused on multiple aspects of word knowledge beyond definitions. However, social strategies, such as seeking help from teachers and peers, were underutilised, especially among science students. The study emphasises the need for pedagogical interventions that address students’ academic vocabulary needs, particularly through explicit instruction.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of English for Academic Purposes-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectAcademic disciplines-
dc.subjectAcademic vocabulary-
dc.subjectHigher education-
dc.subjectProficiency-
dc.subjectVocabulary learning strategies-
dc.titleA mixed-methods study of strategy use in academic vocabulary learning among first-year undergraduates in Hong Kong-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jeap.2025.101482-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85217877798-
dc.identifier.volume74-
dc.identifier.eissn1878-1497-
dc.identifier.issnl1475-1585-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats