File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: Human Papillomavirus (Hpv) Self-Sampling – The Most Preferred Cervical Cancer Screening Method Among Under-Screened Women

TitleHuman Papillomavirus (Hpv) Self-Sampling – The Most Preferred Cervical Cancer Screening Method Among Under-Screened Women
Authors
Issue Date16-Oct-2024
Abstract

Objectives

The aim of this study was to assess the acceptability and attitudes of under-screened women towards HPV self-sampling.


Methods

Study information pamphlets were distributed at the specialist clinic of a regional acute hospital. Women aged 30-65 years were invited to participate either directly face-to-face or via an online website. Women who agreed to participate were given self-sampling kits free-of-charge and an acceptability questionnaire. Participants were instructed to self-collect vaginal samples using a swab and then brush the samples onto a DNA sample storage card, which could be sent back to the hospital by mail or in person. SentisTM HPV assay, an isothermal nucleic acid amplification real-time fluorescent detection assay was used to detect high-risk HPV. Women who were never or under-screened (no screening for >3 years) were included in this analysis.


Results

Among 1248 participants in this study, 545 (43.7%) were never or under-screened: 163 (29.9%) were never-screened and 382 (70.1%) were under-screened. Of these, 349 (64.0%) women were recruited face-to-face and 196 (36.0%) were recruited online. The median age of participants was 49 years and high-risk HPV was detected in 6.1%. The most preferred screening method was HPV self-sampling (46.3% among never-screened, 39.9% among under-screened). Generally, 82.2% of participants described self-sampling as convenient and 77.6% found self-sampling not embarrassing. Majority (91.4%) of women were willing to have self-sampling again, mainly because the test was simple (79.3%) and quick (53.8%). 


Conclusion

HPV self-sampling is highly acceptable and is the most preferred method for cervical cancer screening among under-screened women. 


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354587

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNgu, Siew Fei-
dc.contributor.authorLau, Suk Kwan-
dc.contributor.authorNgan, Hextan Yuen Sheung-
dc.contributor.authorCheung, Annie Nga Yin-
dc.contributor.authorChan, Karen Kar Loen-
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-23T00:35:10Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-23T00:35:10Z-
dc.date.issued2024-10-16-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/354587-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Objectives</strong></p><p>The aim of this study was to assess the acceptability and attitudes of under-screened women towards HPV self-sampling.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Methods</strong></p><p>Study information pamphlets were distributed at the specialist clinic of a regional acute hospital. Women aged 30-65 years were invited to participate either directly face-to-face or via an online website. Women who agreed to participate were given self-sampling kits free-of-charge and an acceptability questionnaire. Participants were instructed to self-collect vaginal samples using a swab and then brush the samples onto a DNA sample storage card, which could be sent back to the hospital by mail or in person. Sentis<sup>TM </sup>HPV assay, an isothermal nucleic acid amplification real-time fluorescent detection assay was used to detect high-risk HPV. Women who were never or under-screened (no screening for >3 years) were included in this analysis.</p><p><br></p><p><strong>Results</strong></p><p>Among 1248 participants in this study, 545 (43.7%) were never or under-screened: 163 (29.9%) were never-screened and 382 (70.1%) were under-screened. Of these, 349 (64.0%) women were recruited face-to-face and 196 (36.0%) were recruited online. The median age of participants was 49 years and high-risk HPV was detected in 6.1%. The most preferred screening method was HPV self-sampling (46.3% among never-screened, 39.9% among under-screened). Generally, 82.2% of participants described self-sampling as convenient and 77.6% found self-sampling not embarrassing. Majority (91.4%) of women were willing to have self-sampling again, mainly because the test was simple (79.3%) and quick (53.8%). </p><p><br></p><p><strong>Conclusion</strong></p><p>HPV self-sampling is highly acceptable and is the most preferred method for cervical cancer screening among under-screened women. </p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Gynecologic Cancer Society (IGCS) 2024 Annual Global Meeting (16/10/2024-18/10/2024, Dublin)-
dc.titleHuman Papillomavirus (Hpv) Self-Sampling – The Most Preferred Cervical Cancer Screening Method Among Under-Screened Women-
dc.typeConference_Paper-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats