File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Evaluating the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline—Recommended and Contemporary Pretest Probability Models in a Mixed Asian Cohort: The Contribution of Coronary Artery Calcium

TitleEvaluating the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline—Recommended and Contemporary Pretest Probability Models in a Mixed Asian Cohort: The Contribution of Coronary Artery Calcium
Authors
Keywordscomputed tomography angiography
coronary artery calcium score
coronary artery disease
pretest probability
risk factor
Issue Date27-Jun-2024
PublisherWiley
Citation
Journal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, 2024, v. 13, n. 13 How to Cite?
AbstractBACKGROUND: Most pretest probability (PTP) tools for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) were Western-developed. The most appropriate PTP models and the contribution of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in Asian populations remain unknown. In a mixed Asian cohort, we compare 5 PTP models: local assessment of the heart (LAH), CAD Consortium (CAD2), risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood, the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and the European Society of Cardiology PTP and 3 extended versions of these models that incorporated CACS: LAH(CACS), CAD2(CACS), and the CACS-clinical likelihood. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study cohort included 771 patients referred for stable chest pain. Obstructive CAD prevalence was 27.5%. Calibration, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) and net reclassification index were evaluated. LAH clinical had the best calibration (χ2 5.8; P=0.12). For CACS models, LAH(CACS) showed least deviation between observed and expected cases (χ2 37.5; P<0.001). There was no difference in AUCs between the LAH clinical (AUC, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.69–0.77]), CAD2 clinical (AUC, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.68–0.76]), risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood (AUC, 0.73 [95% CI: 0.69–0.76) and European Society of Cardiology PTP (AUC, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.67–0.75]). CACS improved discrimination and reclassification of the LAH(CACS) (AUC, 0.88; net reclassification index, 0.46), CAD2(CACS) (AUC, 0.87; net reclassification index, 0.29) and CACS-CL (AUC, 0.87; net reclassification index, 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: In a mixed Asian cohort, Asian-derived LAH models had similar discriminatory performance but better calibration and risk categorization for clinically relevant PTP cutoffs. Incorporating CACS improved discrimination and reclassification. These results support the use of population-matched, CACS-inclusive PTP tools for the prediction of obstructive CAD.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348559
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.126

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaskaran, Lohendran-
dc.contributor.authorYan, Linxuan-
dc.contributor.authorTan, Chun S-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Woon W-
dc.contributor.authorTan, Swee Y-
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, Michelle C-
dc.contributor.authorHan, Donghee-
dc.contributor.authorNakanishi, Rine-
dc.contributor.authorCerci, Rodrigo J-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Ming Yen-
dc.contributor.authorShaw, Leslee J-
dc.contributor.authorChua, Terrance S J-
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, Pamela-
dc.contributor.authorWinther, Simon-
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-10T00:31:34Z-
dc.date.available2024-10-10T00:31:34Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-27-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, 2024, v. 13, n. 13-
dc.identifier.issn2047-9980-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/348559-
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Most pretest probability (PTP) tools for obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) were Western-developed. The most appropriate PTP models and the contribution of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in Asian populations remain unknown. In a mixed Asian cohort, we compare 5 PTP models: local assessment of the heart (LAH), CAD Consortium (CAD2), risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood, the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology and the European Society of Cardiology PTP and 3 extended versions of these models that incorporated CACS: LAH(CACS), CAD2(CACS), and the CACS-clinical likelihood. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study cohort included 771 patients referred for stable chest pain. Obstructive CAD prevalence was 27.5%. Calibration, area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) and net reclassification index were evaluated. LAH clinical had the best calibration (χ2 5.8; P=0.12). For CACS models, LAH(CACS) showed least deviation between observed and expected cases (χ2 37.5; P<0.001). There was no difference in AUCs between the LAH clinical (AUC, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.69–0.77]), CAD2 clinical (AUC, 0.72 [95% CI, 0.68–0.76]), risk factor-weighted clinical likelihood (AUC, 0.73 [95% CI: 0.69–0.76) and European Society of Cardiology PTP (AUC, 0.71 [95% CI, 0.67–0.75]). CACS improved discrimination and reclassification of the LAH(CACS) (AUC, 0.88; net reclassification index, 0.46), CAD2(CACS) (AUC, 0.87; net reclassification index, 0.29) and CACS-CL (AUC, 0.87; net reclassification index, 0.25). CONCLUSIONS: In a mixed Asian cohort, Asian-derived LAH models had similar discriminatory performance but better calibration and risk categorization for clinically relevant PTP cutoffs. Incorporating CACS improved discrimination and reclassification. These results support the use of population-matched, CACS-inclusive PTP tools for the prediction of obstructive CAD.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Heart Association Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectcomputed tomography angiography-
dc.subjectcoronary artery calcium score-
dc.subjectcoronary artery disease-
dc.subjectpretest probability-
dc.subjectrisk factor-
dc.titleEvaluating the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline—Recommended and Contemporary Pretest Probability Models in a Mixed Asian Cohort: The Contribution of Coronary Artery Calcium-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1161/JAHA.123.033879-
dc.identifier.pmid38934865-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85198036977-
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.issue13-
dc.identifier.eissn2047-9980-
dc.identifier.issnl2047-9980-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats