File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Walking (In)Convenience: An In-Depth Study of Pedestrian Detours to Daily Facilities

TitleWalking (In)Convenience: An In-Depth Study of Pedestrian Detours to Daily Facilities
Authors
Keywordsconvenience
detours
public facilities
walkability
Issue Date6-Mar-2024
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
Journal of the American Planning Association, 2024, p. 1-16 How to Cite?
AbstractProblem, research strategy, and findings: As active transport planning gains momentum worldwide, our study underscores the importance of connecting people and places by focusing on the convenience dimension of walkability. Specifically, we used the pedestrian detour ratio (PDR) to measure the degree of circuity of a walking route. We considered residential buildings as origins and 10 different types of public facilities as destinations within the walkable range of 1 km. This led to a territory-wide analysis covering 3.85 million origin–destination pairs in Hong Kong. Overall, walking convenience was the best in the central business district (CBD), but variations existed by district and by facility. Through an assessment matrix, 35.8% of home–destination pairs required attention. When examined at the street block and village cluster levels, walking inconvenience was associated with vehicle-oriented street blocks (with higher vehicular traffic and more private parking spaces), high-income areas, and difficult terrain. Pedestrian crossings, major roads, and bus stops enhanced route directness. This research is a first step in helping quantify the PDR distribution across different cities and their various functional areas. Takeaway for practice: In areas where walking is inconvenient, treatments to calm vehicular traffic and facilitate pedestrian crossings should be stipulated. In the longer term, we recommend integrating the PDR in the design and planning of streets, especially around essential facilities.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345886
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.228

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLoo, Becky PY-
dc.contributor.authorLian, Ting-
dc.contributor.authorFrank, Lawrence D-
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-04T07:06:15Z-
dc.date.available2024-09-04T07:06:15Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-06-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of the American Planning Association, 2024, p. 1-16-
dc.identifier.issn0194-4363-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/345886-
dc.description.abstractProblem, research strategy, and findings: As active transport planning gains momentum worldwide, our study underscores the importance of connecting people and places by focusing on the convenience dimension of walkability. Specifically, we used the pedestrian detour ratio (PDR) to measure the degree of circuity of a walking route. We considered residential buildings as origins and 10 different types of public facilities as destinations within the walkable range of 1 km. This led to a territory-wide analysis covering 3.85 million origin–destination pairs in Hong Kong. Overall, walking convenience was the best in the central business district (CBD), but variations existed by district and by facility. Through an assessment matrix, 35.8% of home–destination pairs required attention. When examined at the street block and village cluster levels, walking inconvenience was associated with vehicle-oriented street blocks (with higher vehicular traffic and more private parking spaces), high-income areas, and difficult terrain. Pedestrian crossings, major roads, and bus stops enhanced route directness. This research is a first step in helping quantify the PDR distribution across different cities and their various functional areas. Takeaway for practice: In areas where walking is inconvenient, treatments to calm vehicular traffic and facilitate pedestrian crossings should be stipulated. In the longer term, we recommend integrating the PDR in the design and planning of streets, especially around essential facilities.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the American Planning Association-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectconvenience-
dc.subjectdetours-
dc.subjectpublic facilities-
dc.subjectwalkability-
dc.titleWalking (In)Convenience: An In-Depth Study of Pedestrian Detours to Daily Facilities-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01944363.2024.2310613-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85187195480-
dc.identifier.spage1-
dc.identifier.epage16-
dc.identifier.eissn1939-0130-
dc.identifier.issnl0194-4363-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats