File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Profiles of attitudes toward inclusive education among Chinese in-service teachers: their relationships with demographic factors and organizational commitment

TitleProfiles of attitudes toward inclusive education among Chinese in-service teachers: their relationships with demographic factors and organizational commitment
Authors
Keywordsattitudes toward inclusive education
Chinese in-service teachers
latent profile analysis
organizational commitment
special educational needs
Issue Date15-May-2024
PublisherFrontiers Media
Citation
Frontiers in Psychology, 2024, v. 15 How to Cite?
Abstract

Introduction: The increased diversity of students (e.g., students with special educational needs) has presented teachers with unprecedented challenges. Teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education play a crucial role in teachers’ organizational well-being. However, existing studies mostly explored attitudes toward inclusive education based on a variable-centered approach. This study used a person-centered approach to identify teachers’ attitude profile membership and explored the relationships of attitude profiles with demographic factors (i.e., gender, years of teaching experience, subject taught, and in-service training) and organizational commitment.

Methods: Nine hundred and seventy-two in-service teachers from forty-nine inclusive education schools in Beijing responded to the Revised Multidimensional Attitudes toward Inclusive Education Scale and the Organizational Commitment Inventory. Latent profile analyses, multinomial logistic regression, and univariate analysis of variance were used to analyze data.

Results and discussion: The results revealed four attitude profiles: involuntary participationbehavior avoidanceneutral, and proactive involvement. Years of teaching experience and in-service training were significant predictors of teachers’ latent profile membership. Teachers belonging to the involuntary participation profile showed the highest levels of maladaptive commitments to inclusive education schools. Teachers belonging to the proactive involvement and the behavior avoidance profiles showed higher levels of adaptive commitments. However, teachers belonging to the neutral profile had the lowest levels of adaptive commitments. The theoretical contributions, practical implications, and limitations are discussed.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344833
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.800

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDeng, Yuhao-
dc.contributor.authorYuan, Wei-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Li-fang-
dc.contributor.authorXie, Zhengli-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-12T04:07:46Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-12T04:07:46Z-
dc.date.issued2024-05-15-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology, 2024, v. 15-
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344833-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> The increased diversity of students (e.g., students with special educational needs) has presented teachers with unprecedented challenges. Teachers’ attitudes toward inclusive education play a crucial role in teachers’ organizational well-being. However, existing studies mostly explored attitudes toward inclusive education based on a variable-centered approach. This study used a person-centered approach to identify teachers’ attitude profile membership and explored the relationships of attitude profiles with demographic factors (i.e., gender, years of teaching experience, subject taught, and in-service training) and organizational commitment.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> Nine hundred and seventy-two in-service teachers from forty-nine inclusive education schools in Beijing responded to the Revised Multidimensional Attitudes toward Inclusive Education Scale and the Organizational Commitment Inventory. Latent profile analyses, multinomial logistic regression, and univariate analysis of variance were used to analyze data.</p><p><strong>Results and discussion:</strong> The results revealed four attitude profiles: <em>involuntary participation</em>, <em>behavior avoidance</em>, <em>neutral</em>, and <em>proactive involvement</em>. Years of teaching experience and in-service training were significant predictors of teachers’ latent profile membership. Teachers belonging to the <em>involuntary participation</em> profile showed the highest levels of maladaptive commitments to inclusive education schools. Teachers belonging to the <em>proactive involvement</em> and the behavior avoidance profiles showed higher levels of adaptive commitments. However, teachers belonging to the <em>neutral</em> profile had the lowest levels of adaptive commitments. The theoretical contributions, practical implications, and limitations are discussed.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers Media-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Psychology-
dc.subjectattitudes toward inclusive education-
dc.subjectChinese in-service teachers-
dc.subjectlatent profile analysis-
dc.subjectorganizational commitment-
dc.subjectspecial educational needs-
dc.titleProfiles of attitudes toward inclusive education among Chinese in-service teachers: their relationships with demographic factors and organizational commitment-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1391862-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85194543996-
dc.identifier.volume15-
dc.identifier.eissn1664-1078-
dc.identifier.issnl1664-1078-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats