File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Pars Opercularis Underlies Efferent Predictions and Successful Auditory Feedback Processing in Speech: Evidence From Left-Hemisphere Stroke

TitlePars Opercularis Underlies Efferent Predictions and Successful Auditory Feedback Processing in Speech: Evidence From Left-Hemisphere Stroke
Authors
Issue Date3-Jun-2024
PublisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology Press
Citation
Neurobiology of Language, 2024, v. 5, n. 2, p. 454-483 How to Cite?
Abstract

Hearing one’s own speech allows for acoustic self-monitoring in real time. Left-hemisphere motor planning regions are thought to give rise to efferent predictions that can be compared to true feedback in sensory cortices, resulting in neural suppression commensurate with the degree of overlap between predicted and actual sensations. Sensory prediction errors thus serve as a possible mechanism of detection of deviant speech sounds, which can then feed back into corrective action, allowing for online control of speech acoustics. The goal of this study was to assess the integrity of this detection–correction circuit in persons with aphasia (PWA) whose left-hemisphere lesions may limit their ability to control variability in speech output. We recorded magnetoencephalography (MEG) while 15 PWA and age-matched controls spoke monosyllabic words and listened to playback of their utterances. From this, we measured speaking-induced suppression of the M100 neural response and related it to lesion profiles and speech behavior. Both speaking-induced suppression and cortical sensitivity to deviance were preserved at the group level in PWA. PWA with more spared tissue in pars opercularis had greater left-hemisphere neural suppression and greater behavioral correction of acoustically deviant pronunciations, whereas sparing of superior temporal gyrus was not related to neural suppression or acoustic behavior. In turn, PWA who made greater corrections had fewer overt speech errors in the MEG task. Thus, the motor planning regions that generate the efferent prediction are integral to performing corrections when that prediction is violated


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344808

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBeach, Sara D.-
dc.contributor.authorTang, Ding-lan-
dc.contributor.authorKiran, Swathi-
dc.contributor.authorNiziolek, Caroline A.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-12T04:07:32Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-12T04:07:32Z-
dc.date.issued2024-06-03-
dc.identifier.citationNeurobiology of Language, 2024, v. 5, n. 2, p. 454-483-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/344808-
dc.description.abstract<p>Hearing one’s own speech allows for acoustic self-monitoring in real time. Left-hemisphere motor planning regions are thought to give rise to efferent predictions that can be compared to true feedback in sensory cortices, resulting in neural suppression commensurate with the degree of overlap between predicted and actual sensations. Sensory prediction errors thus serve as a possible mechanism of detection of deviant speech sounds, which can then feed back into corrective action, allowing for online control of speech acoustics. The goal of this study was to assess the integrity of this detection–correction circuit in persons with aphasia (PWA) whose left-hemisphere lesions may limit their ability to control variability in speech output. We recorded magnetoencephalography (MEG) while 15 PWA and age-matched controls spoke monosyllabic words and listened to playback of their utterances. From this, we measured speaking-induced suppression of the M100 neural response and related it to lesion profiles and speech behavior. Both speaking-induced suppression and cortical sensitivity to deviance were preserved at the group level in PWA. PWA with more spared tissue in pars opercularis had greater left-hemisphere neural suppression and greater behavioral correction of acoustically deviant pronunciations, whereas sparing of superior temporal gyrus was not related to neural suppression or acoustic behavior. In turn, PWA who made greater corrections had fewer overt speech errors in the MEG task. Thus, the motor planning regions that generate the efferent prediction are integral to performing corrections when that prediction is violated<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology Press-
dc.relation.ispartofNeurobiology of Language-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titlePars Opercularis Underlies Efferent Predictions and Successful Auditory Feedback Processing in Speech: Evidence From Left-Hemisphere Stroke -
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1162/nol_a_00139-
dc.identifier.volume5-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage454-
dc.identifier.epage483-
dc.identifier.eissn2641-4368-
dc.identifier.issnl2641-4368-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats