File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Temporal learning analytics to explore traces of self-regulated learning behaviors and their associations with learning performance, cognitive load, and student engagement in an asynchronous online course

TitleTemporal learning analytics to explore traces of self-regulated learning behaviors and their associations with learning performance, cognitive load, and student engagement in an asynchronous online course
Authors
Keywordsasynchronous online course
cognitive load
educational data mining
self-regulated learning
student engagement
temporal learning analytics
Issue Date23-Jan-2023
PublisherFrontiers Media
Citation
Frontiers in Psychology, 2023, v. 13 How to Cite?
Abstract

Self-regulated learning (SRL) plays a critical role in asynchronous online courses. In recent years, attention has been focused on identifying student subgroups with different patterns of online SRL behaviors and comparing their learning performance. However, there is limited research leveraging traces of SRL behaviors to detect student subgroups and examine the subgroup differences in cognitive load and student engagement. The current study tracked the engagement of 101 graduate students with SRL-enabling tools integrated into an asynchronous online course. According to the recorded SRL behaviors, this study identified two distinct student subgroups, using sequence analysis and cluster analysis: high SRL (H-SRL) and low SRL (L-SRL) groups. The H-SRL group showed lower extraneous cognitive load and higher learning performance, germane cognitive load, and cognitive engagement than the L-SRL group did. Additionally, this study articulated and compared temporal patterns of online SRL behaviors between the student subgroups combining lag sequential analysis and epistemic network analysis. The results revealed that both groups followed three phases of self-regulation but performed off-task behaviors. Additionally, the H-SRL group preferred activating mastery learning goals to improve ethical knowledge, whereas the L-SRL group preferred choosing performance-avoidance learning goals to pass the unit tests. The H-SRL group invested more in time management and notetaking, whereas the L-SRL group engaged more in surface learning approaches. This study offers researchers both theoretical and methodological insights. Additionally, our research findings help inform practitioners about how to design and deploy personalized SRL interventions in asynchronous online courses.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/341984
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.800
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSun, Jerry Chih-Yuan-
dc.contributor.authorLiu, Yiming-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Xi-
dc.contributor.authorHu, Xiao-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-26T05:38:44Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-26T05:38:44Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01-23-
dc.identifier.citationFrontiers in Psychology, 2023, v. 13-
dc.identifier.issn1664-1078-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/341984-
dc.description.abstract<p>Self-regulated learning (SRL) plays a critical role in asynchronous online courses. In recent years, attention has been focused on identifying student subgroups with different patterns of online SRL behaviors and comparing their learning performance. However, there is limited research leveraging traces of SRL behaviors to detect student subgroups and examine the subgroup differences in cognitive load and student engagement. The current study tracked the engagement of 101 graduate students with SRL-enabling tools integrated into an asynchronous online course. According to the recorded SRL behaviors, this study identified two distinct student subgroups, using sequence analysis and cluster analysis: high SRL (H-SRL) and low SRL (L-SRL) groups. The H-SRL group showed lower extraneous cognitive load and higher learning performance, germane cognitive load, and cognitive engagement than the L-SRL group did. Additionally, this study articulated and compared temporal patterns of online SRL behaviors between the student subgroups combining lag sequential analysis and epistemic network analysis. The results revealed that both groups followed three phases of self-regulation but performed off-task behaviors. Additionally, the H-SRL group preferred activating mastery learning goals to improve ethical knowledge, whereas the L-SRL group preferred choosing performance-avoidance learning goals to pass the unit tests. The H-SRL group invested more in time management and notetaking, whereas the L-SRL group engaged more in surface learning approaches. This study offers researchers both theoretical and methodological insights. Additionally, our research findings help inform practitioners about how to design and deploy personalized SRL interventions in asynchronous online courses.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherFrontiers Media-
dc.relation.ispartofFrontiers in Psychology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectasynchronous online course-
dc.subjectcognitive load-
dc.subjecteducational data mining-
dc.subjectself-regulated learning-
dc.subjectstudent engagement-
dc.subjecttemporal learning analytics-
dc.titleTemporal learning analytics to explore traces of self-regulated learning behaviors and their associations with learning performance, cognitive load, and student engagement in an asynchronous online course-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1096337-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85147428952-
dc.identifier.volume13-
dc.identifier.eissn1664-1078-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000926239100001-
dc.identifier.issnl1664-1078-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats