File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: SCMR Expert Consensus Statement for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance of Patients with a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device

TitleSCMR Expert Consensus Statement for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance of Patients with a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device
Authors
KeywordsCardiac implantable electronic device
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance
Guidelines
MR safety
Issue Date12-Jan-2024
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2024, v. 26, n. 1 How to Cite?
Abstract

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a proven imaging modality for informing diagnosis and prognosis, guiding therapeutic decisions, and risk stratifying surgical intervention. Patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) would be expected to derive particular benefit from CMR given high prevalence of cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia. While several guidelines have been published over the last 16 years, it is important to recognize that both the CIED and CMR technologies, as well as our knowledge in MR safety, have evolved rapidly during that period. Given increasing utilization of CIED over the past decades, there is an unmet need to establish a consensus statement that integrates latest evidence concerning MR safety and CIED and CMR technologies. While experienced centers currently perform CMR in CIED patients, broad availability of CMR in this population is lacking, partially due to limited availability of resources for programming devices and appropriate monitoring, but also related to knowledge gaps regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR in this growing population. To address the knowledge gaps, this SCMR Expert Consensus Statement integrates consensus guidelines, primary data, and opinions from experts across disparate fields towards the shared goal of informing evidenced-based decision-making regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR for patients with CIEDs.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/341712
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.242
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKim, Daniel-
dc.contributor.authorCollins, Jeremy D-
dc.contributor.authorWhite, James A-
dc.contributor.authorHanneman, Kate-
dc.contributor.authorLee, Daniel C-
dc.contributor.authorPatel, Amit R-
dc.contributor.authorHu, Peng-
dc.contributor.authorLitt, Harold-
dc.contributor.authorWeinsaft, Jonathan W-
dc.contributor.authorDavids, Rachel-
dc.contributor.authorMukai, Kanae-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Ming-Yen-
dc.contributor.authorLuetkens, Julian A-
dc.contributor.authorRoguin, Ariel-
dc.contributor.authorRochitte, Carlos E-
dc.contributor.authorWoodard, Pamela K-
dc.contributor.authorManisty, Charlotte-
dc.contributor.authorZareba, Karolina M-
dc.contributor.authorMont, Lluis-
dc.contributor.authorBogun, Frank-
dc.contributor.authorEnnis, Daniel B-
dc.contributor.authorNazarian, Saman-
dc.contributor.authorWebster, Gregory-
dc.contributor.authorStojanovska, Jadranka-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-20T06:58:29Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-20T06:58:29Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-12-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 2024, v. 26, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn1097-6647-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/341712-
dc.description.abstract<p>Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a proven imaging modality for informing diagnosis and prognosis, guiding therapeutic decisions, and risk stratifying surgical intervention. Patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) would be expected to derive particular benefit from CMR given high prevalence of cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia. While several guidelines have been published over the last 16 years, it is important to recognize that both the CIED and CMR technologies, as well as our knowledge in MR safety, have evolved rapidly during that period. Given increasing utilization of CIED over the past decades, there is an unmet need to establish a consensus statement that integrates latest evidence concerning MR safety and CIED and CMR technologies. While experienced centers currently perform CMR in CIED patients, broad availability of CMR in this population is lacking, partially due to limited availability of resources for programming devices and appropriate monitoring, but also related to knowledge gaps regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR in this growing population. To address the knowledge gaps, this SCMR Expert Consensus Statement integrates consensus guidelines, primary data, and opinions from experts across disparate fields towards the shared goal of informing evidenced-based decision-making regarding the risk-benefit ratio of CMR for patients with CIEDs.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCardiac implantable electronic device-
dc.subjectCardiovascular magnetic resonance-
dc.subjectGuidelines-
dc.subjectMR safety-
dc.titleSCMR Expert Consensus Statement for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance of Patients with a Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.100995-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85184882888-
dc.identifier.volume26-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn1532-429X-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001186857700001-
dc.identifier.issnl1097-6647-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats