File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
  • Find via Find It@HKUL
Supplementary

Article: Are Global University Ranking Tables Still Valued in China?

TitleAre Global University Ranking Tables Still Valued in China?
Authors
Issue Date1-Jul-2022
PublisherDUZ Academic Publishers
Citation
International Higher Education, 2022, v. 112, n. Autumn Issue, p. 37-38 How to Cite?
Abstract

Recently, the withdrawal of Lanzhou University, Nanjing University, and Renmin University in China from major global ranking tables has attracted great attention at home and abroad. One cannot help but wonder whether these withdrawals will be part of a wider trend leading to a chain reaction among Chinese universities. Many university administrators, researchers, and policy makers wonder what this might suggest—if withdrawing from university rankings and the ranking industry in its existing state reflects a government strategy to redefine the concepts of world-class university and world-class discipline and increase the global influence of Chinese universities. They also wonder if this move could be a basis for setting new indicators to assess which Chinese universities and disciplines should be listed in the next round of the Double World-Class University and World-Class Academic Discipline Project (China’s latest excellence initiative that aims to transform over 40 elite Chinese universities into first-rate global universities and more than 100 academic disciplines into first-rate global ones by 2050).


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/340246
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Futao-
dc.contributor.authorPostiglione, Gerard A-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:42:45Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:42:45Z-
dc.date.issued2022-07-01-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Higher Education, 2022, v. 112, n. Autumn Issue, p. 37-38-
dc.identifier.issn1084-0613-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/340246-
dc.description.abstract<p>Recently, the withdrawal of Lanzhou University, Nanjing University, and Renmin University in China from major global ranking tables has attracted great attention at home and abroad. One cannot help but wonder whether these withdrawals will be part of a wider trend leading to a chain reaction among Chinese universities. Many university administrators, researchers, and policy makers wonder what this might suggest—if withdrawing from university rankings and the ranking industry in its existing state reflects a government strategy to redefine the concepts of world-class university and world-class discipline and increase the global influence of Chinese universities. They also wonder if this move could be a basis for setting new indicators to assess which Chinese universities and disciplines should be listed in the next round of the Double World-Class University and World-Class Academic Discipline Project (China’s latest excellence initiative that aims to transform over 40 elite Chinese universities into first-rate global universities and more than 100 academic disciplines into first-rate global ones by 2050).<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherDUZ Academic Publishers-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Higher Education-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleAre Global University Ranking Tables Still Valued in China?-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.volume112-
dc.identifier.issueAutumn Issue-
dc.identifier.spage37-
dc.identifier.epage38-
dc.identifier.issnl1084-0613-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats