File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Real-World Effectiveness Study of Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir or Molnupiravir in Hospitalized Unvaccinated Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases and Moderate COVID-19 at Presentation

TitleReal-World Effectiveness Study of Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir or Molnupiravir in Hospitalized Unvaccinated Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases and Moderate COVID-19 at Presentation
Authors
Keywordsasthma
bronchiectasis
COPD
COVID-19
interstitial lung disease
molnupiravir
nirmatrelvir-ritonavir
Issue Date9-Jan-2024
PublisherTaylor and Francis Group
Citation
International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2024, v. 19, p. 77-86 How to Cite?
Abstract

Introduction: Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV-r) and molnupiravir (MOL) were developed as out-patient anti-viral for mild COVID-19. There was limited data on their role in treating COVID-19 for hospitalized patients, especially among adult patients who are unvaccinated and had chronic respiratory diseases.
Methods: A territory-wide retrospective study was conducted in Hong Kong to compare the efficacy of NMV-r and MOL against COVID-19 in unvaccinated adult patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchiectasis and interstitial lung diseases presenting with moderate COVID-19 from 16th February 2022 to 15th March 2023.
Results: A total of 1354 patients were included, 738 received NMV-r and 616 received MOL. NMV-r was more effective in reducing 90-day mortality with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) of 0.508 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.314– 0.822, p = 0.006). Patients who received NMV-r also had significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) than those receiving MOL, with median LOS of 4 (Interquartile range [IQR] = 2– 7) for NMV-r and 6 (IQR = 3– 10) for MOL (p-value < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the development of respiratory failure and severe respiratory failure in the two groups.
Discussion: NMV-r was more effective than MOL among unvaccinated adults with chronic respiratory diseases who were hospitalized for moderate COVID-19 without hypoxaemia on admission.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339693
ISSN
2013 Impact Factor: 2.732
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.394

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKwok, Wang Chun-
dc.contributor.authorTam, Terence-
dc.contributor.authorHo, James-
dc.contributor.authorLam, David Chi Leung-
dc.contributor.authorIp, Mary Sau-Man-
dc.contributor.authorHo, Pak Leung-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:38:38Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:38:38Z-
dc.date.issued2024-01-09-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 2024, v. 19, p. 77-86-
dc.identifier.issn1176-9106-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339693-
dc.description.abstract<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> Nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (NMV-r) and molnupiravir (MOL) were developed as out-patient anti-viral for mild COVID-19. There was limited data on their role in treating COVID-19 for hospitalized patients, especially among adult patients who are unvaccinated and had chronic respiratory diseases.<br><strong>Methods:</strong> A territory-wide retrospective study was conducted in Hong Kong to compare the efficacy of NMV-r and MOL against COVID-19 in unvaccinated adult patients with asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bronchiectasis and interstitial lung diseases presenting with moderate COVID-19 from 16th February 2022 to 15th March 2023.<br><strong>Results:</strong> A total of 1354 patients were included, 738 received NMV-r and 616 received MOL. NMV-r was more effective in reducing 90-day mortality with adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) of 0.508 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.314– 0.822, p = 0.006). Patients who received NMV-r also had significantly shorter length of stay (LOS) than those receiving MOL, with median LOS of 4 (Interquartile range [IQR] = 2– 7) for NMV-r and 6 (IQR = 3– 10) for MOL (p-value < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in the development of respiratory failure and severe respiratory failure in the two groups.<br><strong>Discussion:</strong> NMV-r was more effective than MOL among unvaccinated adults with chronic respiratory diseases who were hospitalized for moderate COVID-19 without hypoxaemia on admission.<br></p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherTaylor and Francis Group-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectasthma-
dc.subjectbronchiectasis-
dc.subjectCOPD-
dc.subjectCOVID-19-
dc.subjectinterstitial lung disease-
dc.subjectmolnupiravir-
dc.subjectnirmatrelvir-ritonavir-
dc.titleReal-World Effectiveness Study of Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir or Molnupiravir in Hospitalized Unvaccinated Patients with Chronic Respiratory Diseases and Moderate COVID-19 at Presentation-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.2147/COPD.S440895-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85182544120-
dc.identifier.volume19-
dc.identifier.spage77-
dc.identifier.epage86-
dc.identifier.eissn1178-2005-
dc.identifier.issnl1176-9106-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats