File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Global impacts of COVID‐19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health services: An international comparative study on primary care from the INTRePID Consortium

TitleGlobal impacts of COVID‐19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health services: An international comparative study on primary care from the INTRePID Consortium
Authors
KeywordsCOVID-19 pandemic
sexual and reproductive health
Issue Date1-Mar-2024
PublisherWiley
Citation
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2024, v. 131, n. 4, p. 508-517 How to Cite?
Abstract

Objective

To understand how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted sexual and reproductive health (SRH) visits.

Design

An ecological study comparing SRH services volume in different countries before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Setting

Seven countries from the INTernational ConsoRtium of Primary Care BIData Researchers (INTRePID) across four continents.

Population

Over 3.8 million SRH visits to primary care physicians in Australia, China, Canada, Norway, Singapore, Sweden and the USA.

Methods

Difference in average SRH monthly visits before and during the pandemic, with negative binomial regression modelling to compare predicted and observed number of visits during the pandemic for SRH visits.

Main outcome measures

Monthly number of visits to primary care physicians from 2018 to 2021.

Results

During the pandemic, the average volume of monthly SRH visits increased in Canada (15.6%, 99% CI 8.1–23.0%) where virtual care was pronounced. China, Singapore, Sweden and the USA experienced a decline (−56.5%, 99% CI −74.5 to −38.5%; −22.7%, 99% CI −38.8 to −6.5%; −19.4%, 99% CI −28.3 to −10.6%; and −22.7%, 99% CI −38.8 to −6.5%, respectively); while Australia and Norway showed insignificant changes (6.5%, 99% CI −0.7 to –13.8% and 1.7%, 99% CI −6.4 to –9.8%). The countries that maintained (Australia, Norway) or surpassed (Canada) pre-pandemic visit rates had the greatest use of virtual care.

Conclusions

In-person SRH visits to primary care decreased during the pandemic. Virtual care seemed to counterbalance that decline. Although cervical cancer screening appeared insensitive to virtual care, strategies such as incorporating self-collected samples for HPV testing may provide a solution in a future pandemic.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339680
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.7
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.858
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Kangning-
dc.contributor.authorTu, Karen-
dc.contributor.authorLi, Zhuo-
dc.contributor.authorHallinan, Christine Mary-
dc.contributor.authorLaughlin, Adrian-
dc.contributor.authorManski‐Nankervis, Jo‐Anne-
dc.contributor.authorApajee, Jemisha-
dc.contributor.authorLapadula, María Carla-
dc.contributor.authorOrtigoza, Angela-
dc.contributor.authorDa Roza, Cecilia Clara-
dc.contributor.authorBaste, Valborg-
dc.contributor.authorFlottorp, Signe-
dc.contributor.authorWensaas, Knut‐Arne-
dc.contributor.authorGoh, Lay Hoon-
dc.contributor.authorLing, Zheng Jye-
dc.contributor.authorKristiansson, Robert-
dc.contributor.authorGaona, Gabriela-
dc.contributor.authorPace, Wilson D-
dc.contributor.authorWestfall, John M-
dc.contributor.authorNg, Amy Pui Pui-
dc.contributor.authorWong, William Chi‐Wai-
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-11T10:38:32Z-
dc.date.available2024-03-11T10:38:32Z-
dc.date.issued2024-03-01-
dc.identifier.citationBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2024, v. 131, n. 4, p. 508-517-
dc.identifier.issn1470-0328-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/339680-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Objective</h3><p>To understand how the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted sexual and reproductive health (SRH) visits.</p><h3>Design</h3><p>An ecological study comparing SRH services volume in different countries before and after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><h3>Setting</h3><p>Seven countries from the <strong>INT</strong>ernational Conso<strong>R</strong>tium of <strong>P</strong>rimary Care B<strong>I</strong>g <strong>D</strong>ata Researchers (INTRePID) across four continents.</p><h3>Population</h3><p>Over 3.8 million SRH visits to primary care physicians in Australia, China, Canada, Norway, Singapore, Sweden and the USA.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Difference in average SRH monthly visits before and during the pandemic, with negative binomial regression modelling to compare predicted and observed number of visits during the pandemic for SRH visits.</p><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><p>Monthly number of visits to primary care physicians from 2018 to 2021.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>During the pandemic, the average volume of monthly SRH visits increased in Canada (15.6%, 99% CI 8.1–23.0%) where virtual care was pronounced. China, Singapore, Sweden and the USA experienced a decline (−56.5%, 99% CI −74.5 to −38.5%; −22.7%, 99% CI −38.8 to −6.5%; −19.4%, 99% CI −28.3 to −10.6%; and −22.7%, 99% CI −38.8 to −6.5%, respectively); while Australia and Norway showed insignificant changes (6.5%, 99% CI −0.7 to –13.8% and 1.7%, 99% CI −6.4 to –9.8%). The countries that maintained (Australia, Norway) or surpassed (Canada) pre-pandemic visit rates had the greatest use of virtual care.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In-person SRH visits to primary care decreased during the pandemic. Virtual care seemed to counterbalance that decline. Although cervical cancer screening appeared insensitive to virtual care, strategies such as incorporating self-collected samples for HPV testing may provide a solution in a future pandemic.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherWiley-
dc.relation.ispartofBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCOVID-19 pandemic-
dc.subjectsexual and reproductive health-
dc.titleGlobal impacts of COVID‐19 pandemic on sexual and reproductive health services: An international comparative study on primary care from the INTRePID Consortium-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1471-0528.17704-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85176089627-
dc.identifier.volume131-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage508-
dc.identifier.epage517-
dc.identifier.eissn1471-0528-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001100232700001-
dc.identifier.issnl1470-0328-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats