File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Measuring the Transformation of University Students’ Self-Construal for Greater Environmental Sustainability

TitleMeasuring the Transformation of University Students’ Self-Construal for Greater Environmental Sustainability
Authors
Keywordsdata processing and interpretation
education
environmental psychology
higher education
sustainability management
Issue Date2022
Citation
SAGE Open, 2022, v. 12, n. 1 How to Cite?
AbstractUniversity campus sustainability projects frequently aim to promote ecological behavior of their community members. However, these projects rarely consider the level of students’ self-construal, the view of self held by members of the university community (i.e., whether the self is viewed as independent or interdependent with nature). This runs counter to the findings in psychology that people’s behavior is strongly affected by their self-construal. We thus conducted an exploratory attempt to include self-construal measurements into a campus environmental sustainability project at National Taiwan University. We specifically examined whether the university had contributed to the transformation of students’ self-construal for greater environmental sustainability. Toward this end, we first confirmed that a psychological scale for self-construal, the connectedness to nature scale (CNS) that had been mainly tested in Western contexts, successfully predicted the likelihood of students’ ecological behaviors (e.g., reducing waste) in an East Asian context. We found only a small difference in the CNS between students for different academic years, which suggests that the university was unsuccessful in transforming students’ self-construal for greater sustainability. This finding resonates with the practice of universities in the modern era to emphasize cognitive dimensions of learning rather than ontological dimensions. Our results thus suggest that mainstreaming ontological dimensions would be one potential way for universities to move toward campus sustainability.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/335386
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKomatsu, Hikaru-
dc.contributor.authorFu, Shin Pei-
dc.contributor.authorLin, Meng Hui-
dc.contributor.authorHsieh, Yi Huan-
dc.contributor.authorRappleye, Jeremy-
dc.contributor.authorSilova, Iveta-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T08:25:27Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-17T08:25:27Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationSAGE Open, 2022, v. 12, n. 1-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/335386-
dc.description.abstractUniversity campus sustainability projects frequently aim to promote ecological behavior of their community members. However, these projects rarely consider the level of students’ self-construal, the view of self held by members of the university community (i.e., whether the self is viewed as independent or interdependent with nature). This runs counter to the findings in psychology that people’s behavior is strongly affected by their self-construal. We thus conducted an exploratory attempt to include self-construal measurements into a campus environmental sustainability project at National Taiwan University. We specifically examined whether the university had contributed to the transformation of students’ self-construal for greater environmental sustainability. Toward this end, we first confirmed that a psychological scale for self-construal, the connectedness to nature scale (CNS) that had been mainly tested in Western contexts, successfully predicted the likelihood of students’ ecological behaviors (e.g., reducing waste) in an East Asian context. We found only a small difference in the CNS between students for different academic years, which suggests that the university was unsuccessful in transforming students’ self-construal for greater sustainability. This finding resonates with the practice of universities in the modern era to emphasize cognitive dimensions of learning rather than ontological dimensions. Our results thus suggest that mainstreaming ontological dimensions would be one potential way for universities to move toward campus sustainability.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofSAGE Open-
dc.subjectdata processing and interpretation-
dc.subjecteducation-
dc.subjectenvironmental psychology-
dc.subjecthigher education-
dc.subjectsustainability management-
dc.titleMeasuring the Transformation of University Students’ Self-Construal for Greater Environmental Sustainability-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/21582440221079836-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85125847077-
dc.identifier.volume12-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.eissn2158-2440-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000765262300001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats