File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Is knowledge capital theory degenerate? PIAAC, PISA, and economic growth

TitleIs knowledge capital theory degenerate? PIAAC, PISA, and economic growth
Authors
Keywordsadult skills
Human capital theory
international large-scale assessments
OECD
Issue Date2021
Citation
Compare, 2021, v. 51, n. 2, p. 240-258 How to Cite?
AbstractExtending recent analyses using PISA data, the current study utilises the OECD’s Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC) to test the central claims of knowledge capital theory. PIAAC has a distinct advantage over PISA in that it more directly tests levels of purported ‘knowledge capital’ across an entire national workforce, rather than offering approximations based on the performance of 15-year-old students. Findings from our two original studies reported herein further refute the tight linkage between cognitive levels and GDP growth per capita envisaged by proponents of knowledge capital, most notably the OECD and World Bank. These results suggest that knowledge capital theory is now degenerate. If scholars are willing to extend this reporting of results refuting knowledge capital theory, this will likely accelerate the theory’s loss of momentum in the coming years.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/335333
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 1.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.960
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRappleye, Jeremy-
dc.contributor.authorKomatsu, Hikaru-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T08:25:01Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-17T08:25:01Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationCompare, 2021, v. 51, n. 2, p. 240-258-
dc.identifier.issn0305-7925-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/335333-
dc.description.abstractExtending recent analyses using PISA data, the current study utilises the OECD’s Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC) to test the central claims of knowledge capital theory. PIAAC has a distinct advantage over PISA in that it more directly tests levels of purported ‘knowledge capital’ across an entire national workforce, rather than offering approximations based on the performance of 15-year-old students. Findings from our two original studies reported herein further refute the tight linkage between cognitive levels and GDP growth per capita envisaged by proponents of knowledge capital, most notably the OECD and World Bank. These results suggest that knowledge capital theory is now degenerate. If scholars are willing to extend this reporting of results refuting knowledge capital theory, this will likely accelerate the theory’s loss of momentum in the coming years.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofCompare-
dc.subjectadult skills-
dc.subjectHuman capital theory-
dc.subjectinternational large-scale assessments-
dc.subjectOECD-
dc.titleIs knowledge capital theory degenerate? PIAAC, PISA, and economic growth-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03057925.2019.1612233-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85066016166-
dc.identifier.volume51-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage240-
dc.identifier.epage258-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-3623-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000470564200001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats