File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: What drives failed policy at the World Bank? An inside account of new aid modalities to higher education: context, blame, and infallibility

TitleWhat drives failed policy at the World Bank? An inside account of new aid modalities to higher education: context, blame, and infallibility
Authors
Keywordscontext
failed development
faith
global knowledge economy
nomothetic
policy transfer
World Bank
Issue Date2018
Citation
Comparative Education, 2018, v. 54, n. 2, p. 250-274 How to Cite?
AbstractThis article analyses recent World Bank interventions aimed at improving higher education and local research capacity in low-income countries. Our empirical entry point is a critical analysis of the Development and Innovation Grant (DIG) scheme the Bank rolled out in Cambodia (2010–2015), a virtual carbon copy export of its Academic Initiative Fund in Bangladesh. Offering a rare insider perspective, we argue that the DIG scheme ultimately failed because the Bank so glaringly misunderstood the Cambodian context. We use this case to contemplate the deeper flaws in how the Bank ‘thinks’, highlighting how the world’s most powerful development institution manages to maintain faith in its own infallibility despite failure.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/335301
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.692
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRappleye, Jeremy-
dc.contributor.authorUn, Leang-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T08:24:45Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-17T08:24:45Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationComparative Education, 2018, v. 54, n. 2, p. 250-274-
dc.identifier.issn0305-0068-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/335301-
dc.description.abstractThis article analyses recent World Bank interventions aimed at improving higher education and local research capacity in low-income countries. Our empirical entry point is a critical analysis of the Development and Innovation Grant (DIG) scheme the Bank rolled out in Cambodia (2010–2015), a virtual carbon copy export of its Academic Initiative Fund in Bangladesh. Offering a rare insider perspective, we argue that the DIG scheme ultimately failed because the Bank so glaringly misunderstood the Cambodian context. We use this case to contemplate the deeper flaws in how the Bank ‘thinks’, highlighting how the world’s most powerful development institution manages to maintain faith in its own infallibility despite failure.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofComparative Education-
dc.subjectcontext-
dc.subjectfailed development-
dc.subjectfaith-
dc.subjectglobal knowledge economy-
dc.subjectnomothetic-
dc.subjectpolicy transfer-
dc.subjectWorld Bank-
dc.titleWhat drives failed policy at the World Bank? An inside account of new aid modalities to higher education: context, blame, and infallibility-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03050068.2018.1426534-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85041126254-
dc.identifier.volume54-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage250-
dc.identifier.epage274-
dc.identifier.eissn1360-0486-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000427551600007-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats