File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: How to make Lesson Study work in America and worldwide: A Japanese perspective on the onto-cultural basis of (teacher) education

TitleHow to make Lesson Study work in America and worldwide: A Japanese perspective on the onto-cultural basis of (teacher) education
Authors
Keywordsachievement gap
cultural borrowing
Japan
Lesson Study
onto-pedagogy
ontological individualism
ontology
policy transfer
teacher development
The Teaching Gap
United States
“best practice”
Issue Date2017
Citation
Research in Comparative and International Education, 2017, v. 12, n. 4, p. 398-430 How to Cite?
AbstractLesson Study is a Japanese approach to teacher development borrowed by American researchers in the late 1990s seeking to break from top-down, “best practice” approaches. Two decades later, Lesson Study has gained a strong foothold in American policy circles. Seeking to contribute to the growing research base, this article looks deeper into the cultural obstacles obstructing effective practice in the American context. It suggests that the divergent onto-cultural basis of the Japanese context may be one major factor that helps make Lesson Study successful in Japan but challenging in other national contexts worldwide, perhaps most of all in the United States. The account is based on a meta-analysis of existing research on Lesson Study (1999–2015), combined with a reconceptualization of a rich ethnographic literature on compulsory schooling in Japan. This account frames the American borrowing of Japanese teacher developed practice in terms of educational borrowing and lending, suggesting that scholars need to return to the puzzle of culture, engage philosophically, and be open to ontological alterity.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/335291
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRappleye, Jeremy-
dc.contributor.authorKomatsu, Hikaru-
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-17T08:24:40Z-
dc.date.available2023-11-17T08:24:40Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationResearch in Comparative and International Education, 2017, v. 12, n. 4, p. 398-430-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/335291-
dc.description.abstractLesson Study is a Japanese approach to teacher development borrowed by American researchers in the late 1990s seeking to break from top-down, “best practice” approaches. Two decades later, Lesson Study has gained a strong foothold in American policy circles. Seeking to contribute to the growing research base, this article looks deeper into the cultural obstacles obstructing effective practice in the American context. It suggests that the divergent onto-cultural basis of the Japanese context may be one major factor that helps make Lesson Study successful in Japan but challenging in other national contexts worldwide, perhaps most of all in the United States. The account is based on a meta-analysis of existing research on Lesson Study (1999–2015), combined with a reconceptualization of a rich ethnographic literature on compulsory schooling in Japan. This account frames the American borrowing of Japanese teacher developed practice in terms of educational borrowing and lending, suggesting that scholars need to return to the puzzle of culture, engage philosophically, and be open to ontological alterity.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofResearch in Comparative and International Education-
dc.subjectachievement gap-
dc.subjectcultural borrowing-
dc.subjectJapan-
dc.subjectLesson Study-
dc.subjectonto-pedagogy-
dc.subjectontological individualism-
dc.subjectontology-
dc.subjectpolicy transfer-
dc.subjectteacher development-
dc.subjectThe Teaching Gap-
dc.subjectUnited States-
dc.subject“best practice”-
dc.titleHow to make Lesson Study work in America and worldwide: A Japanese perspective on the onto-cultural basis of (teacher) education-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1745499917740656-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85020564232-
dc.identifier.volume12-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage398-
dc.identifier.epage430-
dc.identifier.eissn1745-4999-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000418866600002-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats