File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Disruption of speech motor adaptation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the articulatory representation in primary motor cortex

TitleDisruption of speech motor adaptation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the articulatory representation in primary motor cortex
Authors
KeywordsAuditory feedback perturbation
Sensorimotor adaptation
Speech motor control
Speech perception
TMS
Issue Date2021
Citation
Cortex, 2021, v. 145, p. 115-130 How to Cite?
AbstractWhen auditory feedback perturbation is introduced in a predictable way over a number of utterances, speakers learn to compensate by adjusting their own productions, a process known as sensorimotor adaptation. Despite multiple lines of evidence indicating the role of primary motor cortex (M1) in motor learning and memory, whether M1 causally contributes to sensorimotor adaptation in the speech domain remains unclear. Here, we aimed to assay whether temporary disruption of the articulatory representation in left M1 by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) impairs speech adaptation. To induce sensorimotor adaptation, the frequencies of first formants (F1) were shifted up and played back to participants when they produced “head”, “bed”, and “dead” repeatedly (the learning phase). A low-frequency rTMS train (.6 Hz, subthreshold, 12 min) over either the tongue or the hand representation of M1 (between-subjects design) was applied before participants experienced altered auditory feedback in the learning phase. We found that the group who received rTMS over the hand representation showed the expected compensatory response for the upwards shift in F1 by significantly reducing F1 and increasing the second formant (F2) frequencies in their productions. In contrast, these expected compensatory changes in both F1 and F2 did not occur in the group that received rTMS over the tongue representation. Critically, rTMS (subthreshold) over the tongue representation did not affect vowel production, which was unchanged from baseline. These results provide direct evidence that the articulatory representation in left M1 causally contributes to sensorimotor learning in speech. Furthermore, these results also suggest that M1 is critical to the network supporting a more global adaptation that aims to move the altered speech production closer to a learnt pattern of speech production used to produce another vowel.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/334789
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.330
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTang, Ding Lan-
dc.contributor.authorMcDaniel, Alexander-
dc.contributor.authorWatkins, Kate E.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-10-20T06:50:46Z-
dc.date.available2023-10-20T06:50:46Z-
dc.date.issued2021-
dc.identifier.citationCortex, 2021, v. 145, p. 115-130-
dc.identifier.issn0010-9452-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/334789-
dc.description.abstractWhen auditory feedback perturbation is introduced in a predictable way over a number of utterances, speakers learn to compensate by adjusting their own productions, a process known as sensorimotor adaptation. Despite multiple lines of evidence indicating the role of primary motor cortex (M1) in motor learning and memory, whether M1 causally contributes to sensorimotor adaptation in the speech domain remains unclear. Here, we aimed to assay whether temporary disruption of the articulatory representation in left M1 by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) impairs speech adaptation. To induce sensorimotor adaptation, the frequencies of first formants (F1) were shifted up and played back to participants when they produced “head”, “bed”, and “dead” repeatedly (the learning phase). A low-frequency rTMS train (.6 Hz, subthreshold, 12 min) over either the tongue or the hand representation of M1 (between-subjects design) was applied before participants experienced altered auditory feedback in the learning phase. We found that the group who received rTMS over the hand representation showed the expected compensatory response for the upwards shift in F1 by significantly reducing F1 and increasing the second formant (F2) frequencies in their productions. In contrast, these expected compensatory changes in both F1 and F2 did not occur in the group that received rTMS over the tongue representation. Critically, rTMS (subthreshold) over the tongue representation did not affect vowel production, which was unchanged from baseline. These results provide direct evidence that the articulatory representation in left M1 causally contributes to sensorimotor learning in speech. Furthermore, these results also suggest that M1 is critical to the network supporting a more global adaptation that aims to move the altered speech production closer to a learnt pattern of speech production used to produce another vowel.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofCortex-
dc.subjectAuditory feedback perturbation-
dc.subjectSensorimotor adaptation-
dc.subjectSpeech motor control-
dc.subjectSpeech perception-
dc.subjectTMS-
dc.titleDisruption of speech motor adaptation with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the articulatory representation in primary motor cortex-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cortex.2021.09.008-
dc.identifier.pmid34717269-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85117946835-
dc.identifier.volume145-
dc.identifier.spage115-
dc.identifier.epage130-
dc.identifier.eissn1973-8102-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000721562900009-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats