File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Comparison of the colour accuracy of a single-lens reflex camera and a smartphone camera in a clinical context

TitleComparison of the colour accuracy of a single-lens reflex camera and a smartphone camera in a clinical context
Authors
KeywordsCalibration
Camera
Colour
Digital photography
Smartphone
Spectrophotometer
Issue Date28-Aug-2023
PublisherElsevier
Citation
Journal of Dentistry, 2023, v. 137 How to Cite?
Abstract

Objectives

This study aimed to investigate the colour accuracy of digital photographs captured by a single-lens reflex (SLR) camera and a smartphone camera in a clinical setting.

Methods

Dentate subjects were recruited, and their maxillary anterior teeth were photographed along with a colour target and a dental shade guide. There were eight groups: Group 1: SLR camera with a 100 mm macro-lens and a ring-flash (SLRC); Group 2: SLRC with a polarizer; Group 3: SLRC with white-balance calibration; Group 4: SLRC with a polarizer and white-balance calibration. Groups 5 to 8 were similar to Groups 1 to 4, except a smartphone camera and an external light source (SC) were used. The CIE LAB coordinates of the colour target, shade guide, and centre of the maxillary right central incisor (tooth 11) in the digital photographs were retrieved. The colour difference ΔE=[(ΔL*)2+(Δa*)2+(Δb*)2]1/2 to the reference colour coordinates or the reading of the dental spectrophotometer was calculated. The results were analysed by the Kruskal-Wallis test at α=0.05 with Bonferroni correction.

Results

Thirty-nine subjects were photographed. SLRC with a polarizer showed the largest ΔE in this study (P<0.001). When capturing tooth 11, SLRC with calibrated white-balance resulted in the smallest ΔE in this study (P<0.001), and the use of a polarizer and/or calibrated white-balance did not result in a smaller ΔE than that of SC alone (P>0.001).

Conclusion

Calibration for white-balance is recommended for the SLRC. The use of a polarizer does not show an improvement in colour accuracy. SC alone may be sufficient for intraoral photography.

Clinical significance

When capturing intraoral photography using a single-lens reflex camera, it is recommended to calibrate the white-balance. The use of a polarizer does not significantly improve colour accuracy. However, a smartphone camera with an external light source can serve as a viable alternative.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331499
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 4.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.313
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYung, D-
dc.contributor.authorTse, AK-
dc.contributor.authorHsung, RT-
dc.contributor.authorBotelho, MG-
dc.contributor.authorPow, EH-
dc.contributor.authorLam, WY-
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-21T06:56:23Z-
dc.date.available2023-09-21T06:56:23Z-
dc.date.issued2023-08-28-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Dentistry, 2023, v. 137-
dc.identifier.issn0300-5712-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/331499-
dc.description.abstract<h3>Objectives</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the colour accuracy of digital photographs captured by a single-lens reflex (SLR) camera and a smartphone camera in a clinical setting.</p><h3>Methods</h3><p>Dentate subjects were recruited, and their maxillary anterior teeth were photographed along with a colour target and a dental shade guide. There were eight groups: Group 1: SLR camera with a 100 mm macro-lens and a ring-flash (SLRC); Group 2: SLRC with a polarizer; Group 3: SLRC with white-balance calibration; Group 4: SLRC with a polarizer and white-balance calibration. Groups 5 to 8 were similar to Groups 1 to 4, except a smartphone camera and an external light source (SC) were used. The CIE LAB coordinates of the colour target, shade guide, and centre of the maxillary right central incisor (tooth 11) in the digital photographs were retrieved. The colour difference ΔE=[(ΔL*)<sup>2</sup>+(Δ<em>a</em>*)<sup>2</sup>+(Δ<em>b</em>*)<sup>2</sup>]<sup>1/2</sup> to the reference colour coordinates or the reading of the dental spectrophotometer was calculated. The results were analysed by the Kruskal-Wallis test at α=0.05 with Bonferroni correction.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty-nine subjects were photographed<em>.</em> SLRC with a polarizer showed the largest ΔE in this study (<em>P</em><0.001). When capturing tooth 11, SLRC with calibrated white-balance resulted in the smallest ΔE in this study (<em>P</em><0.001), and the use of a polarizer and/or calibrated white-balance did not result in a smaller ΔE than that of SC alone (<em>P</em>>0.001).</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Calibration for white-balance is recommended for the SLRC. The use of a polarizer does not show an improvement in colour accuracy. SC alone may be sufficient for intraoral photography.</p><h3>Clinical significance</h3><p>When capturing intraoral photography using a single-lens reflex camera, it is recommended to calibrate the white-balance. The use of a polarizer does not significantly improve colour accuracy. However, a smartphone camera with an external light source can serve as a viable alternative.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Dentistry-
dc.subjectCalibration-
dc.subjectCamera-
dc.subjectColour-
dc.subjectDigital photography-
dc.subjectSmartphone-
dc.subjectSpectrophotometer-
dc.titleComparison of the colour accuracy of a single-lens reflex camera and a smartphone camera in a clinical context-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jdent.2023.104681-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85169512498-
dc.identifier.volume137-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001079030700001-
dc.identifier.issnl0300-5712-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats