Does the choice of suture materials affect the vas deferens after hernia ring closure in inguinal hernia surgery: An experimental study in rats

Abstract

<p>Introduction: Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair is a commonly performed procedure in children. Currently, monofilament polypropylene and braided silk are the two most frequently used materials. Studies have suggested more tissue inflammatory reactions with the use of multifilament non -absorb-able sutures. However, little is known about the effects of suture materials on adjacent vas deferens. The aim of this experiment was to compare the effect of non-absorbable monofilament and multifilament sutures on vas deferens in laparoscopic hernia repair. Methods: All animal operations were performed by a single surgeon under aseptic conditions and anaesthesia. Ten male Sprague Dawley rats were divided into two groups. In Group I, "hernia repair" was performed using 5.0 Silk. In Group II, polypropylene sutures (Prolene & REG;; Ethicon, Somerville, N.J., USA) were used. All animals also received sham operations in the left groin as a control. After 14 days, the animals were euthanised and a segment of vas deferens just adjacent to the suture was excised for histological review by an experienced pathologist who was blind to the treatment groups of the respective specimens. Results: The body sizes of the rats in each group were comparable. Group I had significantly smaller vas deferens than Group II (diameter: 0.2 vs. 0.6 & PLUSMN; 0.2, p = 0.005). Silk sutures appeared to cause more tissue adhesion than Prolene & REG; sutures, as graded by blind assessors (adhesion grade: 2.8 & PLUSMN; 1.3 vs. 1.8 & PLUSMN; 0.8, p = 0.1), although this did not reach statistical significance. There was no significant difference in the histological fibrosis score and inflammation score. Conclusion: The only effect of non-absorbable sutures on vas deferens in this rat model was the reduced cross-sectional area of vas deferens and increased tissue adhesion when using silk sutures. However, there was no significant histological difference in inflammation or fibrosis caused by either material.<br></p>