File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1080/17452007.2020.1862043
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85097891087
- WOS: WOS:000600724300001
- Find via
Supplementary
- Citations:
- Appears in Collections:
Article: Design for construction waste minimization: guidelines and practice
Title | Design for construction waste minimization: guidelines and practice |
---|---|
Authors | |
Keywords | architectural design construction waste management Design for construction waste minimization Designing out waste façade design |
Issue Date | 22-Dec-2020 |
Publisher | Taylor and Francis Group |
Citation | Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 2022, v. 18, n. 3, p. 279-298 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Design for Construction Waste Minimization (DfCWM) advocates the proactive minimization of potential construction waste from the design or earlier stage. Numerous DfCWM practices have been recommended, but they are hitherto in a piecemeal fashion without an integrative guideline to enable designers to consider DfCWM in a systematic manner. Their practice examples and application results have also been rarely investigated. This study aims to amalgamate DfCWM recommendations, develop practicable guidelines, and implement in real-world settings. It adopts a design thinking method to develop the guidelines from literature, brainstorming, action research, case study, and most importantly, dynamic iteration thereof. The results affirm the impact of DfCWM on not only preventing construction waste generation effectively but reducing the construction cost without jeopardizing the design. However, its implementation is not merely a simple linear process and requires coordination from all stakeholders. For practitioners, this research also provides the DfCWM guidelines to be a design companion, encouraging deliberation of an entire building and material life cycle with special consideration given to waste minimization. Further studies are suggested for two areas: (a) modelling DfCWM into a multi-criteria optimization problem, and (b) integrating it with other design for excellence considerations. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/329151 |
ISSN | 2023 Impact Factor: 2.7 2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.622 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Laovisutthichai, Vikrom | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lu, Weisheng | - |
dc.contributor.author | Bao, Zhikang | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-08-05T07:55:40Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-08-05T07:55:40Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2020-12-22 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Architectural Engineering and Design Management, 2022, v. 18, n. 3, p. 279-298 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 1745-2007 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/329151 | - |
dc.description.abstract | <p>Design for Construction Waste Minimization (DfCWM) advocates the proactive minimization of potential construction waste from the design or earlier stage. Numerous DfCWM practices have been recommended, but they are hitherto in a piecemeal fashion without an integrative guideline to enable designers to consider DfCWM in a systematic manner. Their practice examples and application results have also been rarely investigated. This study aims to amalgamate DfCWM recommendations, develop practicable guidelines, and implement in real-world settings. It adopts a design thinking method to develop the guidelines from literature, brainstorming, action research, case study, and most importantly, dynamic iteration thereof. The results affirm the impact of DfCWM on not only preventing construction waste generation effectively but reducing the construction cost without jeopardizing the design. However, its implementation is not merely a simple linear process and requires coordination from all stakeholders. For practitioners, this research also provides the DfCWM guidelines to be a design companion, encouraging deliberation of an entire building and material life cycle with special consideration given to waste minimization. Further studies are suggested for two areas: (a) modelling DfCWM into a multi-criteria optimization problem, and (b) integrating it with other design for excellence considerations.</p> | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.publisher | Taylor and Francis Group | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | Architectural Engineering and Design Management | - |
dc.rights | This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. | - |
dc.subject | architectural design | - |
dc.subject | construction waste management | - |
dc.subject | Design for construction waste minimization | - |
dc.subject | Designing out waste | - |
dc.subject | façade design | - |
dc.title | Design for construction waste minimization: guidelines and practice | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1080/17452007.2020.1862043 | - |
dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85097891087 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 18 | - |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 279 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 298 | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1752-7589 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000600724300001 | - |
dc.identifier.issnl | 1745-2007 | - |