File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)

Article: Identifying the impacts of trading construction waste across jurisdictions: a simulation of the Greater Bay Area, China, using non-linear optimization

TitleIdentifying the impacts of trading construction waste across jurisdictions: a simulation of the Greater Bay Area, China, using non-linear optimization
Authors
KeywordsCircular economy
Construction waste management
Environmental innovation
Public pressure
Waste trading
Issue Date2-Feb-2023
PublisherSpringer
Citation
Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, v. 30, n. 16, p. 46884-46899 How to Cite?
Abstract

Local authorities worldwide are actively encouraging waste material trading within their jurisdictions as a promising strategy to develop a more circular economy. Construction activities consume natural resources intensively and generate massive solid waste. With proper ex-post treatment, the waste materials can be recycled or even directly reused, hence contributing to the circular economy. Using the Hong Kong-Macao-Guangdong Greater Bay Area (GBA) as the context, we simulate the impacts of a construction waste trading market on the waste flows and the resulting monetary exchanges. Our model views each city as a representative agent that maximizes the benefit of conducting waste recycling. The interactions of their profit-seeking behavior will lead to optimized overall social costs. We then solve this problem using a non-linear optimization algorithm. The simulation shows that with a fully operational market, the traded waste materials amount to 1253.84 million m3, covering 82.36% of GBA’s total construction waste generation in a typical year. The monetary transactions equal to US$38.41 billion. Such huge payments present a great opportunity for the GBA cities to develop their recycling industries. In addition, we argue that although increasing public pressure is effective in reducing inequalities in the final waste distribution, it also results in fewer financial transactions flowing to less-developed cities, which reduces their funding for developing the circular economy.


Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329137
ISSN
2022 Impact Factor: 5.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.006
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPeng, Ziyu-
dc.contributor.authorLu, Weisheng-
dc.contributor.authorWebster, Chris-
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-05T07:55:35Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-05T07:55:35Z-
dc.date.issued2023-02-02-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research, 2023, v. 30, n. 16, p. 46884-46899-
dc.identifier.issn0944-1344-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/329137-
dc.description.abstract<p>Local authorities worldwide are actively encouraging waste material trading within their jurisdictions as a promising strategy to develop a more circular economy. Construction activities consume natural resources intensively and generate massive solid waste. With proper ex-post treatment, the waste materials can be recycled or even directly reused, hence contributing to the circular economy. Using the Hong Kong-Macao-Guangdong Greater Bay Area (GBA) as the context, we simulate the impacts of a construction waste trading market on the waste flows and the resulting monetary exchanges. Our model views each city as a representative agent that maximizes the benefit of conducting waste recycling. The interactions of their profit-seeking behavior will lead to optimized overall social costs. We then solve this problem using a non-linear optimization algorithm. The simulation shows that with a fully operational market, the traded waste materials amount to 1253.84 million m<sup>3</sup>, covering 82.36% of GBA’s total construction waste generation in a typical year. The monetary transactions equal to US$38.41 billion. Such huge payments present a great opportunity for the GBA cities to develop their recycling industries. In addition, we argue that although increasing public pressure is effective in reducing inequalities in the final waste distribution, it also results in fewer financial transactions flowing to less-developed cities, which reduces their funding for developing the circular economy.</p>-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer-
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectCircular economy-
dc.subjectConstruction waste management-
dc.subjectEnvironmental innovation-
dc.subjectPublic pressure-
dc.subjectWaste trading-
dc.titleIdentifying the impacts of trading construction waste across jurisdictions: a simulation of the Greater Bay Area, China, using non-linear optimization-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11356-023-25516-5-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85147345383-
dc.identifier.volume30-
dc.identifier.issue16-
dc.identifier.spage46884-
dc.identifier.epage46899-
dc.identifier.eissn1614-7499-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000924752100003-
dc.identifier.issnl0944-1344-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats