File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Local response in health emergencies: key considerations for addressing the COVID-19 pandemic in informal urban settlements

TitleLocal response in health emergencies: key considerations for addressing the COVID-19 pandemic in informal urban settlements
Authors
Keywordscommunity–state relations
coronavirus
COVID-19
epidemic response
health data
infectious disease
informal settlements
urban health
Issue Date2020
Citation
Environment and Urbanization, 2020, v. 32, n. 2, p. 503-522 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper highlights the major challenges and considerations for addressing COVID-19 in informal settlements. It discusses what is known about vulnerabilities and how to support local protective action. There is heightened concern about informal urban settlements because of the combination of population density and inadequate access to water and sanitation, which makes standard advice about social distancing and washing hands implausible. There are further challenges to do with the lack of reliable data and the social, political and economic contexts in each setting that will influence vulnerability and possibilities for action. The potential health impacts of COVID-19 are immense in informal settlements, but if control measures are poorly executed these could also have severe negative impacts. Public health interventions must be balanced with social and economic interventions, especially in relation to the informal economy upon which many poor urban residents depend. Local residents, leaders and community-based groups must be engaged and resourced to develop locally appropriate control strategies, in partnership with local governments and authorities. Historically, informal settlements and their residents have been stigmatized, blamed, and subjected to rules and regulations that are unaffordable or unfeasible to adhere to. Responses to COVID-19 should not repeat these mistakes. Priorities for enabling effective control measures include: collaborating with local residents who have unsurpassed knowledge of relevant spatial and social infrastructures, strengthening coordination with local governments, and investing in improved data for monitoring the response in informal settlements.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/326219
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.0
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.993
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWilkinson, Annie-
dc.contributor.authorAli, Harris-
dc.contributor.authorBedford, Juliet-
dc.contributor.authorBoonyabancha, Somsook-
dc.contributor.authorConnolly, Creighton-
dc.contributor.authorConteh, Abu-
dc.contributor.authorDean, Laura-
dc.contributor.authorDecorte, Filiep-
dc.contributor.authorDercon, Bruno-
dc.contributor.authorDias, Sonia-
dc.contributor.authorDodman, David-
dc.contributor.authorDuijsens, Raimond-
dc.contributor.authorD’Urzo, Sandra-
dc.contributor.authorEamer, Gwendolen-
dc.contributor.authorEarle, Lucy-
dc.contributor.authorGupte, Jaideep-
dc.contributor.authorFrediani, Alex Apsan-
dc.contributor.authorHasan, Arif-
dc.contributor.authorHawkins, Kate-
dc.contributor.authorHerbst, Natalia-
dc.contributor.authorKadihasanoglu, Aynur-
dc.contributor.authorKeil, Roger-
dc.contributor.authorKibuchi, Eliud-
dc.contributor.authorLeach, Melissa-
dc.contributor.authorLilford, Richard-
dc.contributor.authorMacarthy, Joseph-
dc.contributor.authorMitlin, Diana-
dc.contributor.authorNapier, David-
dc.contributor.authorO’Donnell, Ian-
dc.contributor.authorOyebode, Oyinlola-
dc.contributor.authorOzano, Kim-
dc.contributor.authorPerera, Laxman-
dc.contributor.authorRashid, Sabina-
dc.contributor.authorRingwald, Beate-
dc.contributor.authorRipoll, Santiago-
dc.contributor.authorSaleem, Amjad-
dc.contributor.authorSatterthwaite, David-
dc.contributor.authorSellu, Sudie Austina-
dc.contributor.authorSiddique, Omar-
dc.contributor.authorSoesilo, Cynthia-
dc.contributor.authorSommer, Kerstin-
dc.contributor.authorSteege, Rosie-
dc.contributor.authorSverdlik, Alice-
dc.contributor.authorTacoli, Cecilia-
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, John-
dc.contributor.authorTheobald, Sally-
dc.contributor.authorTolhurst, Rachel-
dc.contributor.authorWalnycki, Anna-
dc.contributor.authorWatson, Samuel-
dc.contributor.authorWhittaker, Lana-
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-09T09:58:59Z-
dc.date.available2023-03-09T09:58:59Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironment and Urbanization, 2020, v. 32, n. 2, p. 503-522-
dc.identifier.issn0956-2478-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/326219-
dc.description.abstractThis paper highlights the major challenges and considerations for addressing COVID-19 in informal settlements. It discusses what is known about vulnerabilities and how to support local protective action. There is heightened concern about informal urban settlements because of the combination of population density and inadequate access to water and sanitation, which makes standard advice about social distancing and washing hands implausible. There are further challenges to do with the lack of reliable data and the social, political and economic contexts in each setting that will influence vulnerability and possibilities for action. The potential health impacts of COVID-19 are immense in informal settlements, but if control measures are poorly executed these could also have severe negative impacts. Public health interventions must be balanced with social and economic interventions, especially in relation to the informal economy upon which many poor urban residents depend. Local residents, leaders and community-based groups must be engaged and resourced to develop locally appropriate control strategies, in partnership with local governments and authorities. Historically, informal settlements and their residents have been stigmatized, blamed, and subjected to rules and regulations that are unaffordable or unfeasible to adhere to. Responses to COVID-19 should not repeat these mistakes. Priorities for enabling effective control measures include: collaborating with local residents who have unsurpassed knowledge of relevant spatial and social infrastructures, strengthening coordination with local governments, and investing in improved data for monitoring the response in informal settlements.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironment and Urbanization-
dc.subjectcommunity–state relations-
dc.subjectcoronavirus-
dc.subjectCOVID-19-
dc.subjectepidemic response-
dc.subjecthealth data-
dc.subjectinfectious disease-
dc.subjectinformal settlements-
dc.subjecturban health-
dc.titleLocal response in health emergencies: key considerations for addressing the COVID-19 pandemic in informal urban settlements-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0956247820922843-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85084461076-
dc.identifier.volume32-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage503-
dc.identifier.epage522-
dc.identifier.eissn1746-0301-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000532762600001-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats