File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: E-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia

TitleE-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia
Authors
Issue Date2013
Citation
PLoS ONE, 2013, v. 8, n. 9, article no. e75634 How to Cite?
AbstractE-readers are fast rivaling print as a dominant method for reading. Because they offer accessibility options that are impossible in print, they are potentially beneficial for those with impairments, such as dyslexia. Yet, little is known about how the use of these devices influences reading in those who struggle. Here, we observe reading comprehension and speed in 103 high school students with dyslexia. Reading on paper was compared with reading on a small handheld e-reader device, formatted to display few words per line. We found that use of the device significantly improved speed and comprehension, when compared with traditional presentations on paper for specific subsets of these individuals: Those who struggled most with phoneme decoding or efficient sight word reading read more rapidly using the device, and those with limited VA Spans gained in comprehension. Prior eye tracking studies demonstrated that short lines facilitate reading in dyslexia, suggesting that it is the use of short lines (and not the device per se) that leads to the observed benefits. We propose that these findings may be understood as a consequence of visual attention deficits, in some with dyslexia, that make it difficult to allocate attention to uncrowded text near fixation, as the gaze advances during reading. Short lines ameliorate this by guiding attention to the uncrowded span. © 2013.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316445
PubMed Central ID
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSchneps, Matthew H.-
dc.contributor.authorThomson, Jenny M.-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Chen-
dc.contributor.authorSonnert, Gerhard-
dc.contributor.authorPomplun, Marc-
dc.date.accessioned2022-09-14T11:40:28Z-
dc.date.available2022-09-14T11:40:28Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE, 2013, v. 8, n. 9, article no. e75634-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/316445-
dc.description.abstractE-readers are fast rivaling print as a dominant method for reading. Because they offer accessibility options that are impossible in print, they are potentially beneficial for those with impairments, such as dyslexia. Yet, little is known about how the use of these devices influences reading in those who struggle. Here, we observe reading comprehension and speed in 103 high school students with dyslexia. Reading on paper was compared with reading on a small handheld e-reader device, formatted to display few words per line. We found that use of the device significantly improved speed and comprehension, when compared with traditional presentations on paper for specific subsets of these individuals: Those who struggled most with phoneme decoding or efficient sight word reading read more rapidly using the device, and those with limited VA Spans gained in comprehension. Prior eye tracking studies demonstrated that short lines facilitate reading in dyslexia, suggesting that it is the use of short lines (and not the device per se) that leads to the observed benefits. We propose that these findings may be understood as a consequence of visual attention deficits, in some with dyslexia, that make it difficult to allocate attention to uncrowded text near fixation, as the gaze advances during reading. Short lines ameliorate this by guiding attention to the uncrowded span. © 2013.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofPLoS ONE-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.titleE-Readers Are More Effective than Paper for Some with Dyslexia-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0075634-
dc.identifier.pmid24058697-
dc.identifier.pmcidPMC3776763-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-84884218513-
dc.identifier.volume8-
dc.identifier.issue9-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. e75634-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. e75634-
dc.identifier.eissn1932-6203-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000324695900123-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats