File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Pre-service teachers’ figurative and operative graphing actions

TitlePre-service teachers’ figurative and operative graphing actions
Authors
KeywordsCovariational reasoning
Graphing
Operative thought
Quantitative reasoning
Shape thinking
Issue Date2019
Citation
Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 2019, v. 56, article no. 100692 How to Cite?
AbstractWe report on semi-structured clinical interviews to describe U.S. pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ graphing meanings. Our primary goal is to draw on Piagetian notions of figurative and operative thought to identify marked differences in the students’ meanings. Namely, we illustrate students’ meanings dominated by fragments of sensorimotor experience and compare those with students’ meanings dominated by the coordination of mental actions in the form of covarying quantities. Our findings suggest students’ meanings that foreground operative aspects of thought are more generative with respect to graphing. Our findings also indicate that students can encounter perturbations due to potential incompatibilities between figurative and operative aspects of thought.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/315190
ISSN
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.330
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMoore, Kevin C.-
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Irma E.-
dc.contributor.authorPaoletti, Teo-
dc.contributor.authorHobson, Natalie L.F.-
dc.contributor.authorLiang, Biyao-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-05T10:17:59Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-05T10:17:59Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Mathematical Behavior, 2019, v. 56, article no. 100692-
dc.identifier.issn0732-3123-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/315190-
dc.description.abstractWe report on semi-structured clinical interviews to describe U.S. pre-service secondary mathematics teachers’ graphing meanings. Our primary goal is to draw on Piagetian notions of figurative and operative thought to identify marked differences in the students’ meanings. Namely, we illustrate students’ meanings dominated by fragments of sensorimotor experience and compare those with students’ meanings dominated by the coordination of mental actions in the form of covarying quantities. Our findings suggest students’ meanings that foreground operative aspects of thought are more generative with respect to graphing. Our findings also indicate that students can encounter perturbations due to potential incompatibilities between figurative and operative aspects of thought.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Mathematical Behavior-
dc.subjectCovariational reasoning-
dc.subjectGraphing-
dc.subjectOperative thought-
dc.subjectQuantitative reasoning-
dc.subjectShape thinking-
dc.titlePre-service teachers’ figurative and operative graphing actions-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.01.008-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85064135502-
dc.identifier.volume56-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 100692-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 100692-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000504919800012-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats