File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.3390/ijerph19063577
- WOS: WOS:000775405400001
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Web of Science: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Article: A Population Study on COVID-19 Information Sharing: Sociodemographic Differences and Associations with Family Communication Quality and Well-Being in Hong Kong
Title | A Population Study on COVID-19 Information Sharing: Sociodemographic Differences and Associations with Family Communication Quality and Well-Being in Hong Kong |
---|---|
Authors | |
Issue Date | 2022 |
Citation | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, v. 19, p. 3577 How to Cite? |
Abstract | Family support through the sharing of information helps to shape and regulate the health and behaviours of family members, but little is known about how families are sharing COVID-19-related information, or about its associations with family communication quality and well-being. We examined the associations of COVID-19 information sharing methods with sociodemographic characteristics, the perceived benefits of information communication and technology (ICT) methods, and family communication quality and well-being in Hong Kong. Of 4852 respondents (53.2% female, 41.1% aged over 55 years), the most common sharing method was instant messaging (82.3%), followed by face-to-face communication (65.7%), phone (25.5%) and social media (15.8%). Female sex (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) 1.09), older age (aPRs 1.14–1.22) and higher household income (aPR 1.06) (all p ≤ 0.04) were associated with instant messaging use, while post-secondary education was associated with face-to-face (aPR 1.10), video call (aPR 1.79), and email (aPR 2.76) communications (all p ≤ 0.03). Each ICT sharing method used was associated with a higher likelihood of both reported benefits (aPRs 1.26 and 1.52), better family communication quality and family well-being (adjusted βs 0.43 and 0.30) (all p ≤ 0.001). We have first shown that COVID-19 information sharing in families using both traditional methods and ICTs, and using more types of methods, was associated with perceived benefits and better family communication quality and well-being amidst the pandemic. Sociodemographic differences in COVID-19 information sharing using ICTs were observed. Digital training may help enhance social connections and promote family well-being. |
Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/311700 |
ISI Accession Number ID |
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Sit, SMM | - |
dc.contributor.author | Gong, W | - |
dc.contributor.author | Ho, DSY | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lai, YKA | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wong, YMB | - |
dc.contributor.author | Wang, MP | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lam, TH | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-04-01T09:12:02Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-04-01T09:12:02Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2022, v. 19, p. 3577 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/311700 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Family support through the sharing of information helps to shape and regulate the health and behaviours of family members, but little is known about how families are sharing COVID-19-related information, or about its associations with family communication quality and well-being. We examined the associations of COVID-19 information sharing methods with sociodemographic characteristics, the perceived benefits of information communication and technology (ICT) methods, and family communication quality and well-being in Hong Kong. Of 4852 respondents (53.2% female, 41.1% aged over 55 years), the most common sharing method was instant messaging (82.3%), followed by face-to-face communication (65.7%), phone (25.5%) and social media (15.8%). Female sex (adjusted prevalence ratio (aPR) 1.09), older age (aPRs 1.14–1.22) and higher household income (aPR 1.06) (all p ≤ 0.04) were associated with instant messaging use, while post-secondary education was associated with face-to-face (aPR 1.10), video call (aPR 1.79), and email (aPR 2.76) communications (all p ≤ 0.03). Each ICT sharing method used was associated with a higher likelihood of both reported benefits (aPRs 1.26 and 1.52), better family communication quality and family well-being (adjusted βs 0.43 and 0.30) (all p ≤ 0.001). We have first shown that COVID-19 information sharing in families using both traditional methods and ICTs, and using more types of methods, was associated with perceived benefits and better family communication quality and well-being amidst the pandemic. Sociodemographic differences in COVID-19 information sharing using ICTs were observed. Digital training may help enhance social connections and promote family well-being. | - |
dc.language | eng | - |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health | - |
dc.title | A Population Study on COVID-19 Information Sharing: Sociodemographic Differences and Associations with Family Communication Quality and Well-Being in Hong Kong | - |
dc.type | Article | - |
dc.identifier.email | Sit, SMM: shirlsit@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Ho, DSY: syho@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lai, YKA: agneslai@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Wang, MP: mpwang@hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.email | Lam, TH: hrmrlth@HKUCC-COM.hku.hk | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Ho, DSY=rp00427 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lai, YKA=rp02579 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Wang, MP=rp01863 | - |
dc.identifier.authority | Lam, TH=rp00326 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.3390/ijerph19063577 | - |
dc.identifier.hkuros | 332315 | - |
dc.identifier.volume | 19 | - |
dc.identifier.spage | 3577 | - |
dc.identifier.epage | 3577 | - |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000775405400001 | - |