File Download
There are no files associated with this item.
Links for fulltext
(May Require Subscription)
- Publisher Website: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190652807.003.0005
- Scopus: eid_2-s2.0-85060605240
Supplementary
-
Citations:
- Scopus: 0
- Appears in Collections:
Book Chapter: Discussion: Is it monologic? Is it dialogic? What difference does it make?
| Title | Discussion: Is it monologic? Is it dialogic? What difference does it make? |
|---|---|
| Authors | |
| Keywords | Dialogic Ehtnographic material Monologic Signs |
| Issue Date | 2017 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press. |
| Citation | Discussion: Is it monologic? Is it dialogic? What difference does it make?. In Tomlinson, M, Millie, J (Eds.), The Monologic Imagination, p. 81-88. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017 How to Cite? |
| Abstract | This section of the text looks back at the questions posed by the previous three chapters: Is it monologic? Is it dialogic? What difference does it make? Does it matter? The three chapters came to similar conclusions albeit through different emphases and by looking at different sorts of ethnographic material. The text here looks in more detail as to how they did this and makes some conclusions. |
| Persistent Identifier | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/308778 |
| ISBN | |
| Series/Report no. | Oxford Studies in the Anthropology of Language |
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Kulick, Don | - |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-08T07:50:06Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2021-12-08T07:50:06Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2017 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Discussion: Is it monologic? Is it dialogic? What difference does it make?. In Tomlinson, M, Millie, J (Eds.), The Monologic Imagination, p. 81-88. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2017 | - |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 9780190652807 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10722/308778 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | This section of the text looks back at the questions posed by the previous three chapters: Is it monologic? Is it dialogic? What difference does it make? Does it matter? The three chapters came to similar conclusions albeit through different emphases and by looking at different sorts of ethnographic material. The text here looks in more detail as to how they did this and makes some conclusions. | - |
| dc.language | eng | - |
| dc.publisher | Oxford University Press. | - |
| dc.relation.ispartof | The Monologic Imagination | - |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Oxford Studies in the Anthropology of Language | - |
| dc.subject | Dialogic | - |
| dc.subject | Ehtnographic material | - |
| dc.subject | Monologic | - |
| dc.subject | Signs | - |
| dc.title | Discussion: Is it monologic? Is it dialogic? What difference does it make? | - |
| dc.type | Book_Chapter | - |
| dc.description.nature | link_to_subscribed_fulltext | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190652807.003.0005 | - |
| dc.identifier.scopus | eid_2-s2.0-85060605240 | - |
| dc.identifier.spage | 81 | - |
| dc.identifier.epage | 88 | - |
| dc.publisher.place | New York, NY | - |