File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Work and family characteristics as determinants of socioeconomic and sex inequalities in sleep: The Japanese civil servants study

TitleWork and family characteristics as determinants of socioeconomic and sex inequalities in sleep: The Japanese civil servants study
Authors
KeywordsThe Whitehall II study
The British civil servants study
Psychosocial factors
Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI)
Socioeconomic status (SES)
The Japanese civil servants study (JACS)
Issue Date2006
Citation
Sleep, 2006, v. 29, n. 2, p. 206-216 How to Cite?
AbstractStudy Objective: To clarify whether socioeconomic and sex inequalities in poor sleep quality are explained by socioeconomic and sex differences in work and family characteristics. Design: A cross-sectional study. Participants: Three thousand five hundred fifty-six employees (2397 men and 1159 women) aged 20 to 65 years in local government in Japan. Measurements: Respondents completed a self-administered questionnaire that asked about sleep quality, as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; work characteristics, as measured by the job-demand-control-support model, work hours, and shift work; and family characteristics, such as family structure and family-work conflicts. Results: Lower control at work, higher work demands, lower social support, shorter and longer working hours, shift work, being single, higher family-to-work conflict, and higher work-to-family conflict were independently associated with poorer sleep quality in both men and women, In men, the age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of low-grade employees for poor sleep quality was 1.64 (95% confidence interval: 1.14-2.36) in comparison with high-grade employees. The difference in sleep was attenuated when work and family characteristics were adjusted for (OR=1.25 [0.84-1.86]). Among women, there was no significant grade difference in sleep. Women tended to have poorer sleep quality than men (the age-adjusted OR=1.75 [1.49-2.06]). The sex difference was attenuated and no longer significant when adjustments were made for work and family characteristics (OR=1.04 [0.85-1.27]). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that work and family characteristics may be important for reducing socioeconomic and sex inequalities in sleep. Sex differences in the pattern of socioeconomic inequalities in sleep deserve further research.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307462
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 5.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.717
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSekine, Michikazu-
dc.contributor.authorChandola, Tarani-
dc.contributor.authorMartikainen, Pekka-
dc.contributor.authorMarmot, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorKagamimori, Sadanobu-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T06:22:39Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-03T06:22:39Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.citationSleep, 2006, v. 29, n. 2, p. 206-216-
dc.identifier.issn0161-8105-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307462-
dc.description.abstractStudy Objective: To clarify whether socioeconomic and sex inequalities in poor sleep quality are explained by socioeconomic and sex differences in work and family characteristics. Design: A cross-sectional study. Participants: Three thousand five hundred fifty-six employees (2397 men and 1159 women) aged 20 to 65 years in local government in Japan. Measurements: Respondents completed a self-administered questionnaire that asked about sleep quality, as measured by the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; work characteristics, as measured by the job-demand-control-support model, work hours, and shift work; and family characteristics, such as family structure and family-work conflicts. Results: Lower control at work, higher work demands, lower social support, shorter and longer working hours, shift work, being single, higher family-to-work conflict, and higher work-to-family conflict were independently associated with poorer sleep quality in both men and women, In men, the age-adjusted odds ratio (OR) of low-grade employees for poor sleep quality was 1.64 (95% confidence interval: 1.14-2.36) in comparison with high-grade employees. The difference in sleep was attenuated when work and family characteristics were adjusted for (OR=1.25 [0.84-1.86]). Among women, there was no significant grade difference in sleep. Women tended to have poorer sleep quality than men (the age-adjusted OR=1.75 [1.49-2.06]). The sex difference was attenuated and no longer significant when adjustments were made for work and family characteristics (OR=1.04 [0.85-1.27]). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that work and family characteristics may be important for reducing socioeconomic and sex inequalities in sleep. Sex differences in the pattern of socioeconomic inequalities in sleep deserve further research.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofSleep-
dc.subjectThe Whitehall II study-
dc.subjectThe British civil servants study-
dc.subjectPsychosocial factors-
dc.subjectPittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI)-
dc.subjectSocioeconomic status (SES)-
dc.subjectThe Japanese civil servants study (JACS)-
dc.titleWork and family characteristics as determinants of socioeconomic and sex inequalities in sleep: The Japanese civil servants study-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_OA_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/sleep/29.2.206-
dc.identifier.pmid16494089-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-33646932161-
dc.identifier.volume29-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage206-
dc.identifier.epage216-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000240123500013-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats