File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Michael Hand, indoctrination and the inculcation of belief

TitleMichael Hand, indoctrination and the inculcation of belief
Authors
Issue Date2004
Citation
Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2004, v. 38, n. 2, p. 257-267 How to Cite?
AbstractIn 'Religious Upbringing Reconsidered' Michael Hand revisits the debate on the right of parents to give their children a religious upbringing in a liberal context. According to him, the logical difficulty lies in the fact that parents cannot both impart religious beliefs and avoid indoctrination. While Peter Gardner and Jim Mackenzie have responded to Hand's paper and raised a number of pertinent issues, what is missing is a fuller treatment of indoctrination and belief inculcation for children. In this paper, I argue that Hand's fallacy lies in his flawed understanding of indoctrination and belief inculcation: the inculcation of non-rational beliefs, far from being indoctrinatory, is in fact necessary for children in the process of growing up.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307456
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 0.8
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 0.323
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTan, Charlene-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T06:22:38Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-03T06:22:38Z-
dc.date.issued2004-
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Philosophy of Education, 2004, v. 38, n. 2, p. 257-267-
dc.identifier.issn0309-8249-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307456-
dc.description.abstractIn 'Religious Upbringing Reconsidered' Michael Hand revisits the debate on the right of parents to give their children a religious upbringing in a liberal context. According to him, the logical difficulty lies in the fact that parents cannot both impart religious beliefs and avoid indoctrination. While Peter Gardner and Jim Mackenzie have responded to Hand's paper and raised a number of pertinent issues, what is missing is a fuller treatment of indoctrination and belief inculcation for children. In this paper, I argue that Hand's fallacy lies in his flawed understanding of indoctrination and belief inculcation: the inculcation of non-rational beliefs, far from being indoctrinatory, is in fact necessary for children in the process of growing up.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Philosophy of Education-
dc.titleMichael Hand, indoctrination and the inculcation of belief-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.0309-8249.2004.00380.x-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-2942691923-
dc.identifier.volume38-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage257-
dc.identifier.epage267-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000222007900009-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats