File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Socio-economic differences in retirement timing and participation in post-retirement employment in a context of a flexible pension age

TitleSocio-economic differences in retirement timing and participation in post-retirement employment in a context of a flexible pension age
Authors
Keywordspension legislation
post-retirement employment
retirement
labour market participation
socio-economic position
older workers
Issue Date2020
Citation
Ageing and Society, 2020, v. 40, n. 2, p. 348-368 How to Cite?
AbstractSocio-economic circumstances influence later-life employment participation, which may take different forms as retirement processes are complex. We aimed to explore the diverse effects of various socio-economic sub-domains on pre- and post-retirement employment. We used Finnish register data to examine socio-economic predictors of time to retirement (i.e. receiving the statutory pension) using Cox regression analysis and on time spent in post-retirement employment using repeated negative binomial regression analysis over a follow-up between the ages of 63 and 68, i.e. the flexible pension age range. An average wage earner still employed at age 62 spent 13.5 months in pre-retirement employment (this corresponds to time to retirement) and 4.8 months in post-retirement employment. Those with tertiary education retired later, but the educational differences in the total time spent in employment were small when post-retirement employment was also considered. There was little variation in the timing of retirement by household income, but those in the highest quintile spent the longest time in post-retirement employment. Upper non-manual employees, home renters and those with high household debt retired later, and those with high household debt also spent a longer time in post-retirement employment. In a national flexible pension age system, high occupational class and household income thus appear to encourage either later retirement or participation in post-retirement employment. However, economic constraints also appear to necessitate continued employment.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307243
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 2.3
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.026
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLeinonen, Taina-
dc.contributor.authorChandola, Tarani-
dc.contributor.authorLaaksonen, Mikko-
dc.contributor.authorMartikainen, Pekka-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T06:22:13Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-03T06:22:13Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationAgeing and Society, 2020, v. 40, n. 2, p. 348-368-
dc.identifier.issn0144-686X-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307243-
dc.description.abstractSocio-economic circumstances influence later-life employment participation, which may take different forms as retirement processes are complex. We aimed to explore the diverse effects of various socio-economic sub-domains on pre- and post-retirement employment. We used Finnish register data to examine socio-economic predictors of time to retirement (i.e. receiving the statutory pension) using Cox regression analysis and on time spent in post-retirement employment using repeated negative binomial regression analysis over a follow-up between the ages of 63 and 68, i.e. the flexible pension age range. An average wage earner still employed at age 62 spent 13.5 months in pre-retirement employment (this corresponds to time to retirement) and 4.8 months in post-retirement employment. Those with tertiary education retired later, but the educational differences in the total time spent in employment were small when post-retirement employment was also considered. There was little variation in the timing of retirement by household income, but those in the highest quintile spent the longest time in post-retirement employment. Upper non-manual employees, home renters and those with high household debt retired later, and those with high household debt also spent a longer time in post-retirement employment. In a national flexible pension age system, high occupational class and household income thus appear to encourage either later retirement or participation in post-retirement employment. However, economic constraints also appear to necessitate continued employment.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofAgeing and Society-
dc.subjectpension legislation-
dc.subjectpost-retirement employment-
dc.subjectretirement-
dc.subjectlabour market participation-
dc.subjectsocio-economic position-
dc.subjectolder workers-
dc.titleSocio-economic differences in retirement timing and participation in post-retirement employment in a context of a flexible pension age-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0144686X18000958-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85052626875-
dc.identifier.volume40-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage348-
dc.identifier.epage368-
dc.identifier.eissn1469-1779-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000504971400006-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats