File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Chinese responses to Shanghai’s performance in PISA

TitleChinese responses to Shanghai’s performance in PISA
Authors
KeywordsPISA
Chinese responses
Gadamer
China
Shanghai
Issue Date2017
Citation
Comparative Education, 2017, v. 53, n. 2, p. 209-223 How to Cite?
AbstractThis article analyses the public responses in China to Shanghai’s performance in the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Based on data obtained from media accounts and other materials published between 2013 and 2016, the research findings show that the responses in China are generally reflective, measured and self-critical. Drawing upon Gadamer’s notions of ‘tradition’, ‘horizon’ and ‘prejudice’, this paper contends that the responses reflect the prevailing worldviews in China that perceive Shanghai’s education system to be academically rigorous but too exam-oriented and burdensome. It is further argued that Confucian knowledge traditions and structures in China shape the Chinese interpretations of the PISA assessment format, leading them to downplay Shanghai’s success. This study introduces the metaphor of ‘triadic eyes’ and highlights the mediating effects of the ‘local eyes’ of policy actors in an era of global educational governance.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307203
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.1
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.692
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTan, Charlene-
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-03T06:22:08Z-
dc.date.available2021-11-03T06:22:08Z-
dc.date.issued2017-
dc.identifier.citationComparative Education, 2017, v. 53, n. 2, p. 209-223-
dc.identifier.issn0305-0068-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/307203-
dc.description.abstractThis article analyses the public responses in China to Shanghai’s performance in the 2012 Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). Based on data obtained from media accounts and other materials published between 2013 and 2016, the research findings show that the responses in China are generally reflective, measured and self-critical. Drawing upon Gadamer’s notions of ‘tradition’, ‘horizon’ and ‘prejudice’, this paper contends that the responses reflect the prevailing worldviews in China that perceive Shanghai’s education system to be academically rigorous but too exam-oriented and burdensome. It is further argued that Confucian knowledge traditions and structures in China shape the Chinese interpretations of the PISA assessment format, leading them to downplay Shanghai’s success. This study introduces the metaphor of ‘triadic eyes’ and highlights the mediating effects of the ‘local eyes’ of policy actors in an era of global educational governance.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofComparative Education-
dc.subjectPISA-
dc.subjectChinese responses-
dc.subjectGadamer-
dc.subjectChina-
dc.subjectShanghai-
dc.titleChinese responses to Shanghai’s performance in PISA-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03050068.2017.1299845-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85015242152-
dc.identifier.volume53-
dc.identifier.issue2-
dc.identifier.spage209-
dc.identifier.epage223-
dc.identifier.eissn1360-0486-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000399326100004-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats