File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Discipline-specific feedback literacies: A framework for curriculum design

TitleDiscipline-specific feedback literacies: A framework for curriculum design
Authors
KeywordsFeedback
Graduate outcomes
Feedback literacy
Curriculum
Feedback literacies
Issue Date2022
PublisherSpringer Netherlands. The Journal's web site is located at http://springerlink.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=journal&issn=0018-1560
Citation
Higher Education, 2022, v. 83 n. 1, p. 57-77 How to Cite?
AbstractFeedback literacy is an important graduate attribute that supports students’ future work capacities. This study aimed to develop a framework through which discipline-specific feedback literacies, as a set of socially situated skills, can be developed within core curricula. The framework is developed through a content analysis of National Qualifications Frameworks from six countries and UK Subject Benchmark Statements for multiple disciplines, analysis of indicative subject content for a range of disciplines and consultation with subject-matter experts. Whilst most of the benchmark statements incorporate the development of feedback literacy skills related to ‘making judgements’, attributes relating to ‘appreciating feedback’ and ‘taking action based on feedback’ are less prevalent. Skills related to ‘managing the affective challenges of feedback’ are most prevalent in documentation for applied disciplines. The resulting empirically guided curriculum design framework showcases how integrating the development of discipline-specific feedback literacies can be enacted through authentic learning activities and assessment tasks. In terms of implications for practice, the framework represents in concrete terms how discipline-specific feedback literacies can be integrated within higher education curricula. The findings also have implications for policy: by positioning discipline-specific feedback literacies as graduate outcomes, we believe they should be integrated within national qualifications frameworks as crucial skills to be developed through higher education courses. Finally, from a theoretical perspective, we advance conceptions of feedback literacy through a sociocultural approach and propose new directions for research that seek to reconceptualise a singular concept of feedback literacy as multiple feedback literacies that unfold in distinctive ways across disciplines.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/304770
ISSN
2021 Impact Factor: 3.947
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.900
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWinstone, NE-
dc.contributor.authorBalloo, K-
dc.contributor.authorCarless, D-
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-05T02:34:56Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-05T02:34:56Z-
dc.date.issued2022-
dc.identifier.citationHigher Education, 2022, v. 83 n. 1, p. 57-77-
dc.identifier.issn0018-1560-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/304770-
dc.description.abstractFeedback literacy is an important graduate attribute that supports students’ future work capacities. This study aimed to develop a framework through which discipline-specific feedback literacies, as a set of socially situated skills, can be developed within core curricula. The framework is developed through a content analysis of National Qualifications Frameworks from six countries and UK Subject Benchmark Statements for multiple disciplines, analysis of indicative subject content for a range of disciplines and consultation with subject-matter experts. Whilst most of the benchmark statements incorporate the development of feedback literacy skills related to ‘making judgements’, attributes relating to ‘appreciating feedback’ and ‘taking action based on feedback’ are less prevalent. Skills related to ‘managing the affective challenges of feedback’ are most prevalent in documentation for applied disciplines. The resulting empirically guided curriculum design framework showcases how integrating the development of discipline-specific feedback literacies can be enacted through authentic learning activities and assessment tasks. In terms of implications for practice, the framework represents in concrete terms how discipline-specific feedback literacies can be integrated within higher education curricula. The findings also have implications for policy: by positioning discipline-specific feedback literacies as graduate outcomes, we believe they should be integrated within national qualifications frameworks as crucial skills to be developed through higher education courses. Finally, from a theoretical perspective, we advance conceptions of feedback literacy through a sociocultural approach and propose new directions for research that seek to reconceptualise a singular concept of feedback literacy as multiple feedback literacies that unfold in distinctive ways across disciplines.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer Netherlands. The Journal's web site is located at http://springerlink.metapress.com/openurl.asp?genre=journal&issn=0018-1560-
dc.relation.ispartofHigher Education-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectFeedback-
dc.subjectGraduate outcomes-
dc.subjectFeedback literacy-
dc.subjectCurriculum-
dc.subjectFeedback literacies-
dc.titleDiscipline-specific feedback literacies: A framework for curriculum design-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailCarless, D: dcarless@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityCarless, D=rp00889-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10734-020-00632-0-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85096040733-
dc.identifier.hkuros325833-
dc.identifier.volume83-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.identifier.spage57-
dc.identifier.epage77-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000590005300001-
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats