File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Shadow of the contract: How contract structure shapes interfirm dispute resolution

TitleShadow of the contract: How contract structure shapes interfirm dispute resolution
Authors
Keywordsframing
power
control and coordination
disputes
contractual governance
interest-based negotiation and rights-based negotiation
Issue Date2011
Citation
Strategic Management Journal, 2011, v. 32, n. 5, p. 532-555 How to Cite?
AbstractThis paper investigates how contract structure influences interfirm dispute resolution processes and outcomes by examining a unique dataset consisting of over 150,000 pages of documents relating to 102 business disputes. We find that the level of contract detail affects the type of dispute resolution approach that is adopted when conflict arises, and that different approaches are associated with different costs for resolving the dispute. We also find that the effect of contract choice on dispute resolution approach is moderated by the degree of coordination required in the relationship, and that the effect of dispute approach on costs is moderated by the degree of power asymmetry between the parties. Thus, even after controlling for various attributes of the exchange relationship and the dispute, the choice of contracting structure has important strategic implications. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/301762
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 6.5
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 7.820
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLumineau, Fabrice-
dc.contributor.authorMalhotra, Deepak-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-19T02:20:41Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-19T02:20:41Z-
dc.date.issued2011-
dc.identifier.citationStrategic Management Journal, 2011, v. 32, n. 5, p. 532-555-
dc.identifier.issn0143-2095-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/301762-
dc.description.abstractThis paper investigates how contract structure influences interfirm dispute resolution processes and outcomes by examining a unique dataset consisting of over 150,000 pages of documents relating to 102 business disputes. We find that the level of contract detail affects the type of dispute resolution approach that is adopted when conflict arises, and that different approaches are associated with different costs for resolving the dispute. We also find that the effect of contract choice on dispute resolution approach is moderated by the degree of coordination required in the relationship, and that the effect of dispute approach on costs is moderated by the degree of power asymmetry between the parties. Thus, even after controlling for various attributes of the exchange relationship and the dispute, the choice of contracting structure has important strategic implications. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.relation.ispartofStrategic Management Journal-
dc.subjectframing-
dc.subjectpower-
dc.subjectcontrol and coordination-
dc.subjectdisputes-
dc.subjectcontractual governance-
dc.subjectinterest-based negotiation and rights-based negotiation-
dc.titleShadow of the contract: How contract structure shapes interfirm dispute resolution-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/smj.890-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-79953040000-
dc.identifier.volume32-
dc.identifier.issue5-
dc.identifier.spage532-
dc.identifier.epage555-
dc.identifier.eissn1097-0266-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000288860100004-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats