File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Conference Paper: The benefits and costs of employee taking charge: From a resource perspective

TitleThe benefits and costs of employee taking charge: From a resource perspective
Authors
KeywordsConservation of resources theory
Organization-based self-esteem
Taking charge
Issue Date2016
PublisherAcademy of Management.
Citation
76th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (AOM 2016), Anaheim, CA, 5-9 August 2016. In Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016, v. 2016, n. 1 How to Cite?
AbstractDrawing upon conservation of resources theory, this study aims to examine when and how taking charge brings benefits and costs to employees. Using data collected from 392 employees and their supervisors at multiple time points in Mainland China, we found that taking charge leads to higher vitality and lower depletion when employees’ role breadth self-efficacy is high, whereas taking charge yields lower vitality and higher depletion when role breadth self-efficacy is low. In turn, vitality and depletion significantly affect organization-based self- esteem (OBSE), and they jointly mediate the interactive effects of taking charge and role breadth self-efficacy on OBSE. Our results also indicate that OBSE is positively related to subsequent acts of taking charge. From a resource perspective, our study demonstrates that performing taking charge can not only benefit the actors but only come at a cost for them. The implications of our findings for theory and practice are discussed.
DescriptionPaper Session 2078: Double-Edged Swords in Organizational Life
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291275
ISSN

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorOuyang, K-
dc.contributor.authorLam, W-
dc.contributor.authorChen, Z-
dc.contributor.authorCheng, BH-
dc.contributor.authorZhong, J-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-07T14:45:56Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-07T14:45:56Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.citation76th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management (AOM 2016), Anaheim, CA, 5-9 August 2016. In Academy of Management Proceedings, 2016, v. 2016, n. 1-
dc.identifier.issn0065-0668-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291275-
dc.descriptionPaper Session 2078: Double-Edged Swords in Organizational Life-
dc.description.abstractDrawing upon conservation of resources theory, this study aims to examine when and how taking charge brings benefits and costs to employees. Using data collected from 392 employees and their supervisors at multiple time points in Mainland China, we found that taking charge leads to higher vitality and lower depletion when employees’ role breadth self-efficacy is high, whereas taking charge yields lower vitality and higher depletion when role breadth self-efficacy is low. In turn, vitality and depletion significantly affect organization-based self- esteem (OBSE), and they jointly mediate the interactive effects of taking charge and role breadth self-efficacy on OBSE. Our results also indicate that OBSE is positively related to subsequent acts of taking charge. From a resource perspective, our study demonstrates that performing taking charge can not only benefit the actors but only come at a cost for them. The implications of our findings for theory and practice are discussed.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherAcademy of Management.-
dc.relation.ispartofAcademy of Management Proceedings-
dc.subjectConservation of resources theory-
dc.subjectOrganization-based self-esteem-
dc.subjectTaking charge-
dc.titleThe benefits and costs of employee taking charge: From a resource perspective-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.description.natureabstract-
dc.identifier.doi10.5465/ambpp.2016.15687abstract-
dc.identifier.volume2016-
dc.identifier.issue1-
dc.publisher.placeAnaheim, CA-
dc.identifier.issnl0065-0668-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats