File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Examining learning engagement in MOOCs: a self-determination theoretical perspective using mixed method

TitleExamining learning engagement in MOOCs: a self-determination theoretical perspective using mixed method
Authors
KeywordsMOOC
Engagement
Self-determination theory
Psychological needs
Features of course design factors
Issue Date2020
PublisherSpringerOpen. The Journal's web site is located at http://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/
Citation
International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2020, v. 17, p. article no. 7 How to Cite?
AbstractMOOCs as a learning approach are gaining popularity, and helping learners and instructors understand how learning engagement is constructed in a MOOC context is of increasing importance. Although previous research has undoubtedly enriched our knowledge of MOOCs, our understanding of student engagement in the MOOC context is still limited. This study adopts a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach to examine student engagement in MOOCs from the self-determination theory (SDT) perspective. A total of 693 valid responses to a MOOC Engagement-Motivation scale were collected and 82 MOOC participants were interviewed. The results showed significant differences between the MOOC completers and non-completers with respect to the rank of motivators for enrolment and the rank of learning activities for participation. The association between perceived competence and emotional engagement was significantly higher in the MOOC completion group. The results of a multiple regression analysis indicated that the SDT model can significantly predict student engagement. Perceived competence registered the largest positive impact, and perceived relatedness had a slight negative impact on engagement. The three components of engagement can also predict learners’ perceived learning. Emotional engagement showed the largest positive impact. However, logistic regression analysis indicated that these components of engagement poorly predicted MOOC learners’ completion. Qualitative analyses of student interview data revealed three main factors that can promote learners’ SDT needs: active learning, course resources, and instructor accessibility. Implications of the findings can help MOOC designers and educators to better engage their participants.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291172
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLan, M-
dc.contributor.authorHew, KF-
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-07T13:53:14Z-
dc.date.available2020-11-07T13:53:14Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 2020, v. 17, p. article no. 7-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/291172-
dc.description.abstractMOOCs as a learning approach are gaining popularity, and helping learners and instructors understand how learning engagement is constructed in a MOOC context is of increasing importance. Although previous research has undoubtedly enriched our knowledge of MOOCs, our understanding of student engagement in the MOOC context is still limited. This study adopts a sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach to examine student engagement in MOOCs from the self-determination theory (SDT) perspective. A total of 693 valid responses to a MOOC Engagement-Motivation scale were collected and 82 MOOC participants were interviewed. The results showed significant differences between the MOOC completers and non-completers with respect to the rank of motivators for enrolment and the rank of learning activities for participation. The association between perceived competence and emotional engagement was significantly higher in the MOOC completion group. The results of a multiple regression analysis indicated that the SDT model can significantly predict student engagement. Perceived competence registered the largest positive impact, and perceived relatedness had a slight negative impact on engagement. The three components of engagement can also predict learners’ perceived learning. Emotional engagement showed the largest positive impact. However, logistic regression analysis indicated that these components of engagement poorly predicted MOOC learners’ completion. Qualitative analyses of student interview data revealed three main factors that can promote learners’ SDT needs: active learning, course resources, and instructor accessibility. Implications of the findings can help MOOC designers and educators to better engage their participants.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringerOpen. The Journal's web site is located at http://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/-
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectMOOC-
dc.subjectEngagement-
dc.subjectSelf-determination theory-
dc.subjectPsychological needs-
dc.subjectFeatures of course design factors-
dc.titleExamining learning engagement in MOOCs: a self-determination theoretical perspective using mixed method-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailHew, KF: kfhew@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityHew, KF=rp01873-
dc.description.naturepublished_or_final_version-
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s41239-020-0179-5-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85079787765-
dc.identifier.hkuros318618-
dc.identifier.volume17-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 7-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 7-
dc.identifier.eissn2365-9440-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000519377600001-
dc.publisher.placeGermany-
dc.identifier.issnl2365-9440-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats