File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: The production and consumption of land use planning: A neo-institutional economic perspective & three Taiwan case studies of planning layering

TitleThe production and consumption of land use planning: A neo-institutional economic perspective & three Taiwan case studies of planning layering
Authors
KeywordsLand use planning
Market failure
Property rights
Production process
Consumption process
Issue Date2020
PublisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/landusepol
Citation
Land Use Policy, 2020, v. 99, p. article no. 104910 How to Cite?
AbstractHitherto research by planning researchers on the economics of land use planning have sought to interpret and re-interpret the role of such planning as a non-market measure to: (a) remedy market failure; (b) delineate and re-delineate property rights to land; and (c) determine the economic impact (effectiveness) of (a) and (b) on, say, efficiency (welfare), property values, and development. This paper develops the thesis from a neo-institutional economic perspective that the land use planning process is not just an indicative exercise of plan preparation, promulgation, and interpretation, but also a real production and consumption process. The former for laying out or platting a greenfield site is explained by elaborating on the analogy of cutting a diamond, while the latter is explained in terms of the physical features of public goods other than being informational. It then proceeds to how a formal de jure layout imposed by the state as a kind of corrective for an antecedent bottom-up (and in this sense “spontaneous”) de facto pre-existing layout constrains subsequent development of a place. Three Taiwanese examples are used to show how pre-existing ‘cuts’, to places that varied in terms of population and modernity, may constrain and survive subsequent cuts that seek to modernize and reform the former. Reasons based on transaction costs are offered for the key observations.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286332
ISSN
2020 Impact Factor: 5.398
2020 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.668
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLai, LWC-
dc.contributor.authorDavies, SNG-
dc.contributor.authorChan, EHW-
dc.contributor.authorChua, MH-
dc.contributor.authorLin, CL-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-31T07:02:24Z-
dc.date.available2020-08-31T07:02:24Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationLand Use Policy, 2020, v. 99, p. article no. 104910-
dc.identifier.issn0264-8377-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/286332-
dc.description.abstractHitherto research by planning researchers on the economics of land use planning have sought to interpret and re-interpret the role of such planning as a non-market measure to: (a) remedy market failure; (b) delineate and re-delineate property rights to land; and (c) determine the economic impact (effectiveness) of (a) and (b) on, say, efficiency (welfare), property values, and development. This paper develops the thesis from a neo-institutional economic perspective that the land use planning process is not just an indicative exercise of plan preparation, promulgation, and interpretation, but also a real production and consumption process. The former for laying out or platting a greenfield site is explained by elaborating on the analogy of cutting a diamond, while the latter is explained in terms of the physical features of public goods other than being informational. It then proceeds to how a formal de jure layout imposed by the state as a kind of corrective for an antecedent bottom-up (and in this sense “spontaneous”) de facto pre-existing layout constrains subsequent development of a place. Three Taiwanese examples are used to show how pre-existing ‘cuts’, to places that varied in terms of population and modernity, may constrain and survive subsequent cuts that seek to modernize and reform the former. Reasons based on transaction costs are offered for the key observations.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherPergamon. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/landusepol-
dc.relation.ispartofLand Use Policy-
dc.subjectLand use planning-
dc.subjectMarket failure-
dc.subjectProperty rights-
dc.subjectProduction process-
dc.subjectConsumption process-
dc.titleThe production and consumption of land use planning: A neo-institutional economic perspective & three Taiwan case studies of planning layering-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLai, LWC: wclai@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailDavies, SNG: daiwaisi@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailChua, MH: mhychua@connect.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLai, LWC=rp01004-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.104910-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85088943761-
dc.identifier.hkuros313740-
dc.identifier.hkuros329184-
dc.identifier.volume99-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 104910-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 104910-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000594488300008-
dc.publisher.placeUnited Kingdom-
dc.identifier.issnl0264-8377-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats