File Download
  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Is the private sector more efficient? Big data analytics of construction waste management sectoral efficiency

TitleIs the private sector more efficient? Big data analytics of construction waste management sectoral efficiency
Authors
KeywordsPublic-private disparity
Economic efficiency
Construction waste management
Big data
Hong Kong
Issue Date2020
PublisherElsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/resconrec
Citation
Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, v. 155, p. article no. 104674 How to Cite?
AbstractEfficiency disparity between the public and private sectors is a non-trivial issue that concerns fundamental choices of socio-political-economic systems. Waste management academia and industry also wrestle with issues relating to the choice between public and private sectors. To examine the disparity exclusively caused by “sector”, in statistics language, one needs data that is sufficiently big to control many other confounders, e.g., sites, project types, and construction technologies. This paper attempts to ascertain the construction waste management (CWM) efficiency disparity between the public and private sectors by using big data in Hong Kong. The waste disposal records of 132 projects, including 70 public and 62 private projects, were extracted and analysed. By comparing the waste generation flows (WGFs) and accumulative WGFs, it is found that, by and large, there is no significant efficiency disparity in CWM between the two sectors. However, a closer investigation discovered that the private sector outperforms their public counterpart in demolition projects, while the latter performs better in foundation and new building projects. Although there are private projects with higher CWM performance, their divergence between the best and average projects are larger than public ones. Such findings thus reject casual remarks that the private sector is more efficient in CWM. The underlying reasons maybe the waste management index practice promoted in public projects while the private sector is often incentivized to perform better CWM to save waste disposal levies. Future research is recommended to delve into the causes of the efficiency disparity and introduce CWM interventions accordingly.
Descriptioneid_2-s2.0-85078810492link_to_subscribed_fulltext
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/283418
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 11.2
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 2.770
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorXU, J-
dc.contributor.authorLu, W-
dc.contributor.authorYe, M-
dc.contributor.authorXue, F-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, X-
dc.contributor.authorLee, BFP-
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-22T02:56:10Z-
dc.date.available2020-06-22T02:56:10Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.citationResources, Conservation and Recycling, 2020, v. 155, p. article no. 104674-
dc.identifier.issn0921-3449-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/283418-
dc.descriptioneid_2-s2.0-85078810492link_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.description.abstractEfficiency disparity between the public and private sectors is a non-trivial issue that concerns fundamental choices of socio-political-economic systems. Waste management academia and industry also wrestle with issues relating to the choice between public and private sectors. To examine the disparity exclusively caused by “sector”, in statistics language, one needs data that is sufficiently big to control many other confounders, e.g., sites, project types, and construction technologies. This paper attempts to ascertain the construction waste management (CWM) efficiency disparity between the public and private sectors by using big data in Hong Kong. The waste disposal records of 132 projects, including 70 public and 62 private projects, were extracted and analysed. By comparing the waste generation flows (WGFs) and accumulative WGFs, it is found that, by and large, there is no significant efficiency disparity in CWM between the two sectors. However, a closer investigation discovered that the private sector outperforms their public counterpart in demolition projects, while the latter performs better in foundation and new building projects. Although there are private projects with higher CWM performance, their divergence between the best and average projects are larger than public ones. Such findings thus reject casual remarks that the private sector is more efficient in CWM. The underlying reasons maybe the waste management index practice promoted in public projects while the private sector is often incentivized to perform better CWM to save waste disposal levies. Future research is recommended to delve into the causes of the efficiency disparity and introduce CWM interventions accordingly.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherElsevier BV. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/resconrec-
dc.relation.ispartofResources, Conservation and Recycling-
dc.rightsThis work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.-
dc.subjectPublic-private disparity-
dc.subjectEconomic efficiency-
dc.subjectConstruction waste management-
dc.subjectBig data-
dc.subjectHong Kong-
dc.titleIs the private sector more efficient? Big data analytics of construction waste management sectoral efficiency-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailLu, W: wilsonlu@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailXue, F: xuef@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityLu, W=rp01362-
dc.identifier.authorityXue, F=rp02189-
dc.description.naturepostprint-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104674-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85078810492-
dc.identifier.hkuros310559-
dc.identifier.volume155-
dc.identifier.spagearticle no. 104674-
dc.identifier.epagearticle no. 104674-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000540558400046-
dc.publisher.placeNetherlands-
dc.identifier.issnl0921-3449-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats