File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Conference Paper: RCT Comparing Molar Two-and Three-unit RBBs – Interim Findings

TitleRCT Comparing Molar Two-and Three-unit RBBs – Interim Findings
Authors
Issue Date2018
PublisherInternational Association for Dental Research. The Proceedings' web site is located at https://iadr.abstractarchives.com/home
Citation
The 32nd International Association for Dental Research (IADR) Southeast Asian Division & 29th South East Asia Association for Dental Education (SEAADE) Annual Scientific Meeting, Da Nang, Vietnam, 11-14 September 2018, Presentation ID: 0135 How to Cite?
AbstractObjectives: Resin-bonded bridges (RBBs) are conservative prostheses requireing minimal tooth reduction. While two-unit cantilever (CL2) RBBs have been shown to be more successful than fixed-fixed counterparts, they are not recommended for molar-sized edentulous spans. This study reports the interim findings of a randomized-controlled trial comparing three-unit fixed-movable (FM3) and CL2 RBBs for molar-sized spans (8-10 mm). IRB-UW 14-233, Clinicaltrial.gov NCT02239718 Methods: Patients with one or more missing molars and meeting the inclusion/extrusion criteria were recruited and randomized (ratio 1:1) into CL2 (test) or FM3 (control) group. Patients were examined by independent assessors at baseline, 1-, 6-, 12- and 24-month after insertion of RBBs. Abutment teeth mobility were assessed by Periotest and abutment teeth movement were assessed by superimposition of pre- and postoperative digitized teeth. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by 14-items visual analogue scale after insertion of RBBs. Oral health-related quality of life was assessed using Oral Health Impact Factor (OHIP-49). Results: Fifty-one patients were reviewed and 63 RBBs were inserted with 29 CL2 and 34 FM3 RBBs. Fifty-three patients were reviewed at 1-month, 38 at 6-months, 29 at 12-month and five at 24-month. The majority of these prostheses were provided by undergraduate dental students. Two CL2 and one FM3 RBBs debonded resulting in retention rate of 93.1% and 97.1%. All were rebonded. Seven CL2 abutment teeth has increased in mobility while two of abutment teeth of FM3 increased. No tooth has moved greater than 0.5mm. The mean OHIP-49 scores of CL2 and FM3 groups were 33.1 and 38.2 respectively (p>0.05), whereas the general satisfaction of CL2 and FM3 were 84.1 and 90.1 respectively (p=0.049). No adverse outcomes were reported. Conclusions: The interim data show that CL2 RBBs can be successfully placed for molar spans with no observable complications. Longer term data will be collected. UGC-GRF no.17100314
DescriptionOral Session 3: Prosthodontics and Implantology/ Cariology and Mineralized Tissues(I) - Final Presentation ID: 0135
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/277791

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBotelho, MG-
dc.contributor.authorLam, YH-
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-04T08:01:25Z-
dc.date.available2019-10-04T08:01:25Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationThe 32nd International Association for Dental Research (IADR) Southeast Asian Division & 29th South East Asia Association for Dental Education (SEAADE) Annual Scientific Meeting, Da Nang, Vietnam, 11-14 September 2018, Presentation ID: 0135-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/277791-
dc.descriptionOral Session 3: Prosthodontics and Implantology/ Cariology and Mineralized Tissues(I) - Final Presentation ID: 0135-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Resin-bonded bridges (RBBs) are conservative prostheses requireing minimal tooth reduction. While two-unit cantilever (CL2) RBBs have been shown to be more successful than fixed-fixed counterparts, they are not recommended for molar-sized edentulous spans. This study reports the interim findings of a randomized-controlled trial comparing three-unit fixed-movable (FM3) and CL2 RBBs for molar-sized spans (8-10 mm). IRB-UW 14-233, Clinicaltrial.gov NCT02239718 Methods: Patients with one or more missing molars and meeting the inclusion/extrusion criteria were recruited and randomized (ratio 1:1) into CL2 (test) or FM3 (control) group. Patients were examined by independent assessors at baseline, 1-, 6-, 12- and 24-month after insertion of RBBs. Abutment teeth mobility were assessed by Periotest and abutment teeth movement were assessed by superimposition of pre- and postoperative digitized teeth. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by 14-items visual analogue scale after insertion of RBBs. Oral health-related quality of life was assessed using Oral Health Impact Factor (OHIP-49). Results: Fifty-one patients were reviewed and 63 RBBs were inserted with 29 CL2 and 34 FM3 RBBs. Fifty-three patients were reviewed at 1-month, 38 at 6-months, 29 at 12-month and five at 24-month. The majority of these prostheses were provided by undergraduate dental students. Two CL2 and one FM3 RBBs debonded resulting in retention rate of 93.1% and 97.1%. All were rebonded. Seven CL2 abutment teeth has increased in mobility while two of abutment teeth of FM3 increased. No tooth has moved greater than 0.5mm. The mean OHIP-49 scores of CL2 and FM3 groups were 33.1 and 38.2 respectively (p>0.05), whereas the general satisfaction of CL2 and FM3 were 84.1 and 90.1 respectively (p=0.049). No adverse outcomes were reported. Conclusions: The interim data show that CL2 RBBs can be successfully placed for molar spans with no observable complications. Longer term data will be collected. UGC-GRF no.17100314-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherInternational Association for Dental Research. The Proceedings' web site is located at https://iadr.abstractarchives.com/home-
dc.relation.ispartofIADR-SEA (International Association for Dental Research (Southeast Asian Division)) Annual Scientific Meeting, Da Nang, Vietnam, 2018-
dc.titleRCT Comparing Molar Two-and Three-unit RBBs – Interim Findings-
dc.typeConference_Paper-
dc.identifier.emailBotelho, MG: botelho@hkucc.hku.hk-
dc.identifier.emailLam, YH: retlaw@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityBotelho, MG=rp00033-
dc.identifier.authorityLam, YH=rp02183-
dc.identifier.hkuros307034-
dc.identifier.spagePresentation ID: 0135-
dc.identifier.epagePresentation ID: 0135-
dc.publisher.placeDa Nang, Vietnam-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats