File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

Supplementary

Others: ROA-Matched Discretionary Accruals Models vs. the Original Jones Type Models: A Cost and Benefit Analysis

TitleROA-Matched Discretionary Accruals Models vs. the Original Jones Type Models: A Cost and Benefit Analysis
Authors
Issue Date2012
PublisherSchool of Business, the University of Hong Kong
Citation
Biddle, GC & Shih, M.. ROA-Matched Discretionary Accruals Models vs. the Original Jones Type Models: A Cost and Benefit Analysis. Hong Kong: School of Business, the University of Hong Kong. 2012 How to Cite?
DescriptionWorking Paper
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/267184

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBiddle, GC-
dc.contributor.authorShih, M.-
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-11T08:26:31Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-11T08:26:31Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationBiddle, GC & Shih, M.. ROA-Matched Discretionary Accruals Models vs. the Original Jones Type Models: A Cost and Benefit Analysis. Hong Kong: School of Business, the University of Hong Kong. 2012-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/267184-
dc.descriptionWorking Paper-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSchool of Business, the University of Hong Kong-
dc.titleROA-Matched Discretionary Accruals Models vs. the Original Jones Type Models: A Cost and Benefit Analysis-
dc.typeOthers-
dc.identifier.emailBiddle, GC: biddle@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityBiddle, GC=rp00230-
dc.identifier.hkuros211521-
dc.publisher.placeHong Kong-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats