File Download

There are no files associated with this item.

  Links for fulltext
     (May Require Subscription)
Supplementary

Article: Relationships Among Epistemic Beliefs, Perception of Learning Environment, Study Approaches and Academic Performance: A Longitudinal Exploration with 3P Model

TitleRelationships Among Epistemic Beliefs, Perception of Learning Environment, Study Approaches and Academic Performance: A Longitudinal Exploration with 3P Model
Authors
Keywords3P model
Academic performance
Approaches to study
Epistemic beliefs
Perception of learning environment
Issue Date2018
PublisherSpringer. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/journal/40299
Citation
The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2018, v. 27 n. 4, p. 267-276 How to Cite?
AbstractA plethora of work has been done to examine the dynamics of learning in higher education contexts to foster positive learning outcomes. The 3P model (Biggs in Teaching for quality learning at university, Open University Press, Birkshire, 2003) is one theoretical model that has been well researched. However, much of the work to date has focused on examining relationships of two factors (either presage and process; or process and product) of the model, with relatively less effort made to test the interactivity among the three factors in entirety. The present study examined the variables from all three factors of the 3P model longitudinally. Specifically, epistemic beliefs were tracked as the presage variable, alongside students’ perceptions of the learning environment and use of study approaches as process variables, finally with academic performance and epistemic belief at later time point as product variables. Two hundred and eighty-four Chinese college students participated in the study. Selfreported instruments were used to measure epistemic belief at two time points (Lee and Chan in Asia Pac Educ Res 24(4):603–612, 2015), approaches to learning (Biggs et al. in Br J Educ Psychol 71(1):133–149, 2001) and perception of learning environment (Taylor et al. in Int J Educ Res 27(4):293–302, 1997). A structural equation model showed that epistemic beliefs at Time 1 yielded a direct effect on academic performance without being mediated by any process variables; there seemed to be a disjuncture from presage to product variable as conjectured in the 3P model, and this warrants future investigation.
Persistent Identifierhttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/263422
ISSN
2023 Impact Factor: 3.6
2023 SCImago Journal Rankings: 1.122
ISI Accession Number ID

 

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLee, WWS-
dc.contributor.authorChan, CKK-
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-22T07:38:37Z-
dc.date.available2018-10-22T07:38:37Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.citationThe Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 2018, v. 27 n. 4, p. 267-276-
dc.identifier.issn0119-5646-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10722/263422-
dc.description.abstractA plethora of work has been done to examine the dynamics of learning in higher education contexts to foster positive learning outcomes. The 3P model (Biggs in Teaching for quality learning at university, Open University Press, Birkshire, 2003) is one theoretical model that has been well researched. However, much of the work to date has focused on examining relationships of two factors (either presage and process; or process and product) of the model, with relatively less effort made to test the interactivity among the three factors in entirety. The present study examined the variables from all three factors of the 3P model longitudinally. Specifically, epistemic beliefs were tracked as the presage variable, alongside students’ perceptions of the learning environment and use of study approaches as process variables, finally with academic performance and epistemic belief at later time point as product variables. Two hundred and eighty-four Chinese college students participated in the study. Selfreported instruments were used to measure epistemic belief at two time points (Lee and Chan in Asia Pac Educ Res 24(4):603–612, 2015), approaches to learning (Biggs et al. in Br J Educ Psychol 71(1):133–149, 2001) and perception of learning environment (Taylor et al. in Int J Educ Res 27(4):293–302, 1997). A structural equation model showed that epistemic beliefs at Time 1 yielded a direct effect on academic performance without being mediated by any process variables; there seemed to be a disjuncture from presage to product variable as conjectured in the 3P model, and this warrants future investigation.-
dc.languageeng-
dc.publisherSpringer. The Journal's web site is located at http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/journal/40299-
dc.relation.ispartofThe Asia-Pacific Education Researcher-
dc.rightsThe final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/[insert DOI]-
dc.subject3P model-
dc.subjectAcademic performance-
dc.subjectApproaches to study-
dc.subjectEpistemic beliefs-
dc.subjectPerception of learning environment-
dc.titleRelationships Among Epistemic Beliefs, Perception of Learning Environment, Study Approaches and Academic Performance: A Longitudinal Exploration with 3P Model-
dc.typeArticle-
dc.identifier.emailChan, CKK: ckkchan@hku.hk-
dc.identifier.authorityChan, CKK=rp00891-
dc.description.naturelink_to_subscribed_fulltext-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40299-018-0384-3-
dc.identifier.scopuseid_2-s2.0-85049572736-
dc.identifier.hkuros295425-
dc.identifier.volume27-
dc.identifier.issue4-
dc.identifier.spage267-
dc.identifier.epage276-
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000437478000002-
dc.publisher.placeGermany-
dc.identifier.issnl0119-5646-

Export via OAI-PMH Interface in XML Formats


OR


Export to Other Non-XML Formats